Solving a cubic (or rather simplifying a real root in complex form)

AlterWolfie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The determinate of the following 3x3 matrix

1-y, 2 , 3
2 , 4-y, 5
3 , 5 , 7-y

gives a cubic that simplifies to,

y^3 - 12*y^2 + y + 1 = 0.

Now, apparently the teacher picked random numbers for the original matrix, making the problem delve into other realms of mathematics. It isn't solvable by factoring methods, but using Cardano's method...
Letting,

y = x +4,

the cubic becomes,

(x + 4)^3 - 12*(x + 4)^2 + (x + 4) + 1 = 0.

This simplifies to,

x^3 - 47*x -123 = 0,

which is in the form

x^3 + b*x + c = 0.

To solve a cubic like this, b and c are just plugged into the following formula,

x = ( -(c/2) + ((c/2)^1/2 + (b/3)^1/3)^1/2)^1/3 + (-(c/2) - ((c/2)^1/2 + (b/3)^1/3)^1/2)^1/3,

which for my cubic comes out...

x = ((123/2) + (-6809/108)^1/2)^1/3 + ((123/2) - (-6809/108)^1/2)^1/3.

This is a real root, but I have no idea how to simplify it, ridding it of the complex parts.
Sorry to show all the lead up, it really wasn't needed for the simplification, but since the rules say to show what you have done... I did.
Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There exist real numbers that can only be expressed in terms of radicals by taking a detour through the complex numbers -- it may not be possible to simplify this expression.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top