Solving a Double Integral: 0.23 Numerically, Analytically Possible?

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Solve double integral
\int^1_0\int^1_x\sin(y^2)dydx


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I got with Wolfram Mathematica 7.0 result 0.23 numerically. Can it be solved analyticaly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:

Homework Statement


Solve double integral
\int^1_0\int^1_x\sin(y^2)dydx

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I got with Wolfram Mathematica 7.0 result 0.23 numerically. Can it be solved analyticaly?
Yes, it can be solved analytically. Change the order of integration.
 
I'm not sure how?
 
At present, you're integrating over a set of points (x,y) with

(1) 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
(2) x ≤ y ≤ 1

If you're going to reverse the order of integration, you need two new restraints:

(1') (some number) ≤ y ≤ (some other number)
(2') (some number or an expression with y) ≤ x ≤ (another expression that may contain y)

Try sketching this set on a piece of paper and translate (1),(2) to a geometric shape and that back again to (1'),(2'). Then you can rewrite your integral:
$$
\int_{(1)}\int_{(2)} \sin(y^2)\, \mathrm dy \, \mathrm dx = \int_{(1')}\int_{(2')}\sin(y^2) \, \mathrm dx \, \mathrm dy
$$
 
LagrangeEuler said:
I'm not sure how?

Draw the region you are integrating over. It's a triangle in the xy plane, right? Then just set the integration up so you do dx first then dy.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
I'm not sure how?

Dick said:
Draw the region you are integrating over. It's a triangle in the xy plane, right? Then just set the integration up so you do dx first then dy.

To add to what Dick said, whenever a situation arises where you're considering changing the order of integration, it's alway a good idea to sketch the region over which integration is taking place.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top