Solving a Functional Equation - Muzialis

  • Thread starter Thread starter muzialis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functional
muzialis
Messages
156
Reaction score
1
Hi All,

I am asked to produce a function such that, literally, increasing the indipendent variable by lambda will produce an increase in the function of a*lambda.

I thought about setting up an equation as follows

y(lambda*x)=a*lambda*y(x)

In general a simple solution of the functional equation y(ax)-by(x)=0 is y = Kx^(ln(a)/ln(b)). C is arbitrary

Using this solution scheme I am unable to obtain solutions independent upon lambda.

Is the task well posed at all?

Thank you very much

Muzialis
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would have formulated it as:

Find y such that y(x + λ) = y(x) + aλ.
 
EnumaElish,

thanks for the hint.

Your set up is coherent with my description.
However I have been imprecise, the increase is specified in the task as a multiplicative factor, so my set up is the one actually that needs solving.

I am pretty sure the task was badly posed though as I do not see how a solution could exist.

But then, that is why I posted the issue.

Thanks and all the best

Muzialis
 
Could it mean y((1+λ)x) = (1+aλ)y(x)?

With y(λx) = aλy(x), assume (trivially) λ = 1. Then y(x) = ay(x), which is a contradiction except for a = 1. In this formulation λ has to be > 1.
 
EnumaElish,

I appreciate your ad absurdum reasoning. But can you find any solution for lambda > 1?

I am sure the task was badly posed. The fact is it was proposed to me by a working partner whose maths is usually very precise, so I wanted to be extra sure I was not stating nonsense.

It has been later clarified that all it was needed was a function with a derivative of lambda, locally in a point of interest.

I am curious now tough, if the set up I originally proposed has any solution at all, although I fear not.

Thank you very much

Best Regards

Muzialis
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top