Solving a Limit Problem: Can't Grasp the Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tbarqawi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Tbarqawi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I've been trying to solve this limit problem for some time. Here is the problem:-
<br /> \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {\frac{6sin(x) - 2sin(3x)}{tan^3(3x)}}<br />


I cannot use l'hopital's rule to solve it. I've tried taking 2 as a factor, then trying to use a trig identity, but I couldn't figure a thing. Dividing by x doesn't work either.

I have a feeling this problem is easy, yet I can't grasp the solution. So I figured I would get some help here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tbarqawi said:
So I've been trying to solve this limit problem for some time. Here is the problem:-
<br /> \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {\frac{6sin(x) - 2sin(3x)}{tan^3(3x)}}<br />


I cannot use l'hopital's rule to solve it. I've tried taking 2 as a factor, then trying to use a trig identity, but I couldn't figure a thing. Dividing by x doesn't work either.

I have a feeling this problem is easy, yet I can't grasp the solution. So I figured I would get some help here.

Do you mean that you are not allowed to use l'Hospital's rule, or do you mean you don't know how to use it in this problem?
 
Yeah the textbook does not allow it.
 
Tbarqawi said:
Yeah the textbook does not allow it.

What ARE you allowed to use? If we don't know that we cannot make any sensible suggestions.
 
Ok, let me explain. The textbook has no mention of l'hopital's rule, thus we cannot use it. The way we are supposed to solve limits is by the "theorem" : the lim as x approaches 0 of sin(a*x) / sin(b*x) = a / b. To solve trigonometric limits, we use trigonometric identities usually to reach a state where we can use this theorem to "get rid" of what makes the denominator zero and then get the answer by substituting.
 
Can you decompose tan(x) into sin(x)/cos(x) and work from there?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top