Solving a Linear System with Dimensional Analysis

TheFerruccio
Messages
216
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the Ax=b

Homework Equations


A=##\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & \cos (L \lambda ) & \sin (L \lambda ) \\
\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & -\cos \left(\frac{L
\lambda }{2}\right) & -\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)
\\
\lambda \cos \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)+4 \sin
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & \lambda \sin \left(\frac{L
\lambda }{2}\right) & -\lambda \cos \left(\frac{L \lambda
}{2}\right) \\
\end{array}
\right)##
b=zero vector.
x = what I am trying to solve for.

The Attempt at a Solution



This can be done a variety of ways, including in Mathematica. Do I try to solve for λ first, then plug it into the matrix, and solve for x? I've found that even being very precise with my λ yields x = 0. Is there any other way to approach this problem that is simpler?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the context for this problem? I ask because if it's from a physical situation where L represents a length, then it looks, based on dimensional analysis, like you may have made a mistake in deriving the matrix.

When you say you solved for ##\lambda##, what criterion were you using — that A is singular?
 
Whoa, you're right! I usually check that. I totally forgot. λ in this case is √(P/(E I)) which has dimensions of 1/length. So, I corrected the matrix (algebra error that I subsequently found):

##\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & \cos (L \lambda ) & \sin (L \lambda ) \\
\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & -\cos \left(\frac{L
\lambda }{2}\right) & -\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)
\\
\lambda \cos \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)+\frac{4 \sin
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)}{L} & \lambda \sin
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & -\lambda \cos
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) \\
\end{array}
\right)##

Also, yes, I'm solving it with the assumption that I want the matrix to be singular, so I have to solve for λ first, by taking the determinant and solving the characteristic equation.

This yields the first λ = 4.0575/L. Converting from the def. of λ, I get ##P=\frac{(4.0575^2) \text{E} \text{I}}{L^2}##.
This problem is an excerpt from a larger problem I have been working on in the engineering section, but I felt that this part would get some visibility here. Thanks for pointing out the dimensional error.

Now, the only thing that remains baffling me is the lack of a "k" anywhere in my matrix. The problem is from here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=727016. I will post my dilemma in that thread.

A side note: I really hope I am following the forum policy correctly. Engineering problems are tough to pose in this environment, as they bring in a lot of different mathematics concepts into one. I felt compelled to lift the linear algebra problem out of there and into somewhere with more visibility. This problem, as far as the linear algebra of it is concerned, is solved now. Thanks again! Apologies if I accidentally violated policy by not properly encapsulating my problems into single threads.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top