Why does integrating probability density yield a dimensionless number?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Unkraut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Unkraut
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Hello!
I study mathematics and am in my sixth year, but...
I have a very elementary question:

I stumbled upon it while learning for quantum mechanics. But it's nothing new, it's happening to me all the time: I get confused by things like this!

Observe the following facts:
Suppose we deal with the space of wave functions over the real line.
The wave function [tex]\psi(x)[/tex] is a complex scalar. Take for example [tex]\psi(x)=e^{ikx}[/tex] (not normalizable, don't need it)
The derivative [tex]\psi'(x)=ike^{ikx}[/tex] has 1/length as it's unit.
Integrating that over some interval yields a scalar. [tex]\psi(b)-\psi(a)[/tex]
The probability density [tex]\psi*(x)\psi(x)[/tex] is a scalar.
Integrating this over the real line (length) gives 1. A scalar...
Shouldn't such an operation yield a length? Am I stupid?

I am not joking. For me this is a mystery.

Thanks for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you integrate the probability density (scalar) with respect to length, the answer will have the same dimension (scalar x length).
 
I can't get what you want to calculate and it seems for me that it hardly makes sense, but obvious mistake you did is that [itex]\int_a^b\psi^{*}(x)\psi(x) dx[/itex] is not equal 1, but [itex]b-a[/itex]
 
xts said:
I can't get what you want to calculate and it seems for me that it hardly makes sense, but obvious mistake you did is that [itex]\int_b^a\psi^{*}(x)\psi(x) dx[/itex] is not equal 1, but [itex]b-a[/itex]

Sorry, I was talking about integrating over the whole (1-dimensional) space here (which has the physical dimension of length). And the total probability (of an physical wave function, not the example I used) should be 1.
But I see that my example e^ikx is not an example for a real wave function. And an actual wave function (in 1-space) actually has dimension sqrt(length), as for example the Gaussian wave packet:

[tex]\psi(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma}}[/tex] with sigma being a length.

So my question was useless and came from wrong presumptions.