Solving a Matrix: Finding Positive & Negative Solutions

helpm3pl3ase
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
have a matrix:

X1+X2+X3+X4 = 0
X1+X2-X3-X4 = 0
X1-X2+X3-X4 = 0

the solutions that are formed are:
t
-t
-t
t

Now i understand that they just used t to label the free variables.. but Iam not sure how they were able to tell which were negative and positive.. I tried to do it out, but just confused myself more.. Help anyone?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The answer means:
X1 = t
X2 = -t
X3 = -t
X4 = t

The reason for the signs is they have to add to zero in all three cases.

For instance:
Take X1+X2+X3+X4

If you substitute the answer in you get:

t+ (-t) + (-t)+t

t+(-t) is zero and (-t)+t is zero so they add to zero.

In the second case:

X1+X2-X3-X4

In this case substituting in the answer:

t + (-t) - (-t) - t

t + (-t) is zero and -(-t)-t is zero

The third case is left as an exercise for the student.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top