Chemistry Solving a Mole Fraction Problem with X & Y @ 250°C

AI Thread Summary
At 250°C, liquid X has a vapor pressure of 900 mm Hg and liquid Y has a vapor pressure of 600 mm Hg. To achieve a total vapor pressure of 760 mm Hg, the mole fraction of X must be calculated using the equation Ptot = (Xa)Px + (1-Xa)Py. The correct approach reveals that the total pressure is not simply the sum of the individual pressures. The final calculation shows that the minimum mole fraction of X necessary for the mixture to boil at this temperature is approximately 53.33%.
MeKnos
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
this problem should be simple, but i must be doing it wrong.

At 250 degrees Celsius, a certain liquid X has a vapor pressure of 900 mm Hg and a second liquid Y has a pressure of 600 mm Hg. What is the minimum mole fraction of X necessary for the mixture to boil at this temperature (assume atmosphere pressure is 1 atm).

MY WORK:

Since I know that the total pressure at this temperature is 1500 mm Hg, and only 760 mm Hg is needed, then only about 51% of the pressures are needed. But when I do (51%)(900) and (49%)(600), it doesn't add up to 760 mm Hg.

When I do guess and check, i get about 53.3% of compound X. How do you do this problem!
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is expression that describes total vapor pressure over the mixture?

Hint: total pressure is not 1500 mmHg.
 
Borek said:
What is expression that describes total vapor pressure over the mixture?

Hint: total pressure is not 1500 mmHg.

I think I got it, but I just want to confirm the answer.

Ptot= (Xa)Px + (1-Xa)Py.
760 = (Xa)900 + 600 - (Xa)600
760 - 600 = 160 = 300(Xa)

Xa = 160/300 = 53.33%?
 
Looks OK.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top