Solving a Physics Question: Understanding the Calculation of K = 320J

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProBasket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The calculation of K = 320J is correct when all units are converted to SI (MKS) units, specifically meters per second for velocity. Mixing units like kilometers per hour leads to incorrect results, as evidenced by the initial calculation yielding 4243.12 without proper unit conversion. The kinetic energy formula, K = 1/2 * mass * velocity^2, must be applied with consistent units to achieve accurate results. Converting the given speeds from km/h to m/s is essential for the calculation to yield 320J. Attention to units is crucial in physics calculations to avoid discrepancies.
ProBasket
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
K = 1/2(1300kg)(10km/h)^2 + 1/2(1600kg)(6.6km/h)^2-1/2(2900)(8.12)^2 = 320J


how is that 320J? when i plug that into my calculator, i get 4243.12(not sure what units this is in). can someone tell me why that K is 320 j?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to convert EVERYTHING into SI (MKS) units if you want your energy to be nicely expressed in joules at the end, you cannot just mix in km and hours.


Edit: and what do you mean you don't know what units your answer is in? Obviously it is in kg * km^2 / h^2, which is not a joule.
 


It seems like there may be an error in your calculation. When I plug in the given values, I also get a result of 4243.12, but in units of Joules (J). However, when I convert the given speeds from km/h to m/s, I get a result of 320J. This is because the given equation is in terms of kinetic energy, which is equal to 1/2 * mass * velocity^2. In order to get the correct result, the units for velocity must be in meters per second (m/s) instead of kilometers per hour (km/h). So, the correct calculation would be:

K = 1/2(1300kg)(10km/h)^2 + 1/2(1600kg)(6.6km/h)^2-1/2(2900)(8.12)^2 = 320J
= 1/2(1300kg)(2.78m/s)^2 + 1/2(1600kg)(1.83m/s)^2-1/2(2900)(2.26m/s)^2
= 1/2(1300kg)(7.73m/s)^2 + 1/2(1600kg)(3.34m/s)^2-1/2(2900)(5.11m/s)^2
= 320J

I hope this helps to clarify the discrepancy in the results. Remember to always pay attention to the units when performing calculations in physics!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top