Solving a Puzzling Lift Problem: Net Upward Force on the Man

  • Thread starter Thread starter happyjoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Lift Net
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a builder in a lift, pulling on a rope with a force of 650N. The builder's weight is 735N, and he is trying to understand the net upward force acting on him. The confusion arises from the relationship between the forces exerted by the floor of the lift and the weight of the builder. It is clarified that the builder's pulling action on the rope creates an upward force of 650N from the rope, which, combined with the force from the floor, results in a net upward force. The key takeaway is that the net force is calculated by considering both the upward forces and the weight of the builder.
happyjoe
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hey everyone, this problem has been bugging me for days now, and no matter how many times I've attempted it, I feel like its going wrong.

http://img258.echo.cx/img258/4409/lift3ad.png

The buillder has a mass of 75kg and the cradle has a mass of 35kg. The builder pulls on the rope with a force of 650N.

The rope will exert a force of 650N upwards on the man and 650N upwards on the cradle.

Explain why the net upward force on the man is:

Force exerted by floor of lift - (weight of man - 650N)


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



Force exerted by floor of lift = 650N
Weight of man = 735N

Now what I don't get is where the other 650N comes from? If the force exerted by the floor of the lift is 650, and the weight of man is 735N, then surely his net upward force is minus 85 Newtons? The only way the equation makes sense is if the the force exerted by the floor of the lift is equal to the upward force, minus the weight? Which again gives me negative 85 Newtons?

If anyone could help me and tell me where I am going wrong i'd really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Is he trying to pull the whole thing up? As in, is the rope he is pulling connected to the box he's in?

2) Check what cancels out, meaning, what is equal and opposite? Him pulling on the rope, makes the rope pull on him, right? His weight on the floor, means the floor pushes back. So what's left?
 
Poop-Loops said:
1) Is he trying to pull the whole thing up? As in, is the rope he is pulling connected to the box he's in?

2) Check what cancels out, meaning, what is equal and opposite? Him pulling on the rope, makes the rope pull on him, right? His weight on the floor, means the floor pushes back. So what's left?

Thanks for replying! :D

Well he's accelerating (doesnt say how much), so he's definitely pulling the whole box up including himself.

I just took into account that if he's pulling the cradle up then the floor is lifting him 650N, and the fact he's pulling the rope means a further 650 must be lifting him. Then I took away his weight, which must be exerted back onto the floor and got a net force of 1300N - (his weight) 735 N = 565N, but again I think that's wrong.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top