Solving a Question on Abstract Algebra - Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter kateng33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Abstract
kateng33
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
need a help can't seem to figure out this one

let 6 = (2,R)

a. Find c [1 1]
[1 0 ]
b. c [o 1]
[1 0]

c find 2(6)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kateng33 said:
need a help can't seem to figure out this one

let 6 = (2,R)
I have no idea what this means. "6" is a number. You can't "let" it be anything else!

a. Find c [1 1]
[1 0 ]
Okay, the matrix is
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{bmatrix}
but what does "c" mean? The column space? That is just the space spanned by the columns as vectors, <1 1> and <1 0> which is all of R2. Surely, that is not what you mean. If it were "d" instead of "c", I might guess "determinant", which is normally abbreviated "det". That is, of course, -1.

b. c [o 1]
[1 0]
Now the matrix is
\begin{bmatrix}0 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 0\end{bmatrix}
but I still don't know what "c" means.

c find 2(6)
12? Surely that is not what you mean! Please explain your symbols.
 
okay thanks
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top