Solving a time independent Schrodinger equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a time-independent Schrödinger equation with a hyperbolic potential, specifically focusing on the form of the equation and the constants involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for solving the differential equation, including series solutions and transformations. Questions arise regarding the nature of constants and the complexity of the equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and suggestions for potential approaches, such as considering series solutions and transformations. There is an acknowledgment of the difficulty in reducing the equation to known forms, with one participant suggesting a possible connection to hypergeometric functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constants involved in the equation and express challenges in manipulating the equation into recognizable forms for solution methods. There is a sense of ongoing exploration without a definitive resolution yet.

collpitt
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello!
I am currently stuck with a time independent Schrödinger equation where the potential "V(x)" is hyperbolic in nature. I was wondering if anyone could give me a hint as to how I should approach this problem in order to get an analytical solution (without using numerical techniques).



Homework Equations


The equation is of the form,
d²/dx²(Ѱ) + 2m/ħ²{E + δp²/x(p-x)}(Ѱ) = 0
where the voltage V(x) = -{δp²/x(p-x)}


The Attempt at a Solution


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stupid question: is \delta just a number here?
 
Yes, δ, E, p are all constants.
I am trying to solve it by defining z = y(x) and changing the differential equation. But it is getting quite complicated. :(

Any help would be gladly appreciated.
 
Did u try series solution for diffrntial eqn
 
Yes. But I am unable to reduce the equation to any of the forms I know (bessel, legendre, laguerre, hermite, chebyshev).
 
collpitt said:
Yes. But I am unable to reduce the equation to any of the forms I know (bessel, legendre, laguerre, hermite, chebyshev).

I believe the solution is a series, I'll give you a clue; hyper
 
Yesss! Thank you! I believe it can be reduced to the hypergeometric form. Thank you very much [bold]genericusrnme[/bold] !
I will post the solution as soon as I finish.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K