Solving an absolute value inequality

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the absolute value inequality |x/(x-2)| < 5. The initial attempts to simplify the inequality led to incorrect conclusions about the solution set, specifically stating x < 5/3 and x > 5/2, which is logically impossible. Participants clarify that the correct approach involves rewriting the inequality as a single rational expression and considering the signs of both the numerator and denominator. Additionally, there is a focus on proper mathematical notation for clarity in forum discussions. Ultimately, the key takeaway is the importance of accurately handling inequalities and understanding their implications on solution sets.
physphys
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



lx/(x-2)l < 5

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


x/(x-2) < 5
x< 5x-10
10 < 4x
5/2 < x

x/(x-2) > -5
x > -5x+10
6x > 10
x > 5/3

The answer is x < 5/3 and x > 5/2
so where did I go wrong on the second one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physphys said:

Homework Statement



lx/(x-2)l < 5

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


x/(x-2) < 5
x< 5x-10
10 < 4x
5/2 < x

x/(x-2) > -5
x > -5x+10
6x > 10
x > 5/3

The answer is x < 5/3 and x > 5/2
so where did I go wrong on the second one?
For P a positive real number, \ \displaystyle \left| f(x) \right|&lt;P\ is equivalent to -P&lt;f(x)&lt;P\ .

More to the point, \displaystyle \ \frac{x}{x-2}&lt;5\ is not equivalent to \ x&lt;5(x-2)\ .\ In fact, if x-2 is negative, then you need to change the sense of the inequality .


You're much better off to write \displaystyle \ \frac{x}{x-2}&lt;5\ as \displaystyle \ \frac{x}{x-2}-5&lt;0\,,\ then write the left-hand side as a single rational expression by using a common denominator .
 
SammyS said:
For P a positive real number, \ \displaystyle \left| f(x) \right|&lt;P\ is equivalent to -P&lt;f(x)&lt;P\ .

More to the point, \displaystyle \ \frac{x}{x-2}&lt;5\ is not equivalent to \ x&lt;5(x-2)\ .\ In fact, if x-2 is negative, then you need to change the sense of the inequality .


You're much better off to write \displaystyle \ \frac{x}{x-2}&lt;5\ as \displaystyle \ \frac{x}{x-2}-5&lt;0\,,\ then write the left-hand side as a single rational expression by using a common denominator .

Okay so I simplified that farther to achieve this, 2(3x-5) / x-2 > 0. So now how do I i know if X> 5/3 OR X<5/3, also wouldn't there be an inequality in the denominator, such as x>2 or x<2 . Also how do display the mathematical operation like that on the forum?
 
physphys said:
The answer is x < 5/3 and x > 5/2
so where did I go wrong on the second one?
The answer can't possibly be "x < 5/3 and x > 5/2". There aren't any numbers that are simultaneously smaller than 5/3, and larger than 5/2.

physphys said:
Okay so I simplified that farther to achieve this, 2(3x-5) / x-2 > 0.
How did you get this? I'm assuming you are starting from x/(x - 2) - 5 < 0, and took Sammy's advice to combine the two terms on the left into a single rational expression.

Also, if 2(3x-5) / x-2 is supposed to mean this:
$$ \frac{2(3x - 5)}{x - 2}$$
then you need to write it with parentheses around the entire denominator, like so:
2(3x-5) / (x-2)
Otherwise, we would interpret this to mean this:
$$ \frac{2(3x - 5)}{x} - 2$$
physphys said:
So now how do I i know if X> 5/3 OR X<5/3, also wouldn't there be an inequality in the denominator, such as x>2 or x<2 . Also how do display the mathematical operation like that on the forum?
 
physphys said:
Okay so I simplified that farther to achieve this, 2([STRIKE] 3 [/STRIKE] 2x-5) / ( x-2 ) > 0. So now how do I i know if X> 5/3 OR X<5/3, also wouldn't there be an inequality in the denominator, such as x>2 or x<2 . Also how do display the mathematical operation like that on the forum?

So you have one expression, 2(2x-5), divided by another, (x-2), and the result is positive. How does the sign of the numerator compare to the sign of the denominator ?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top