Solving Angle X with Sin(x/2)=1/2 & Tan(x)=sqrt(3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anzas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
To solve for angle x given sin(x/2) = 1/2 and tan(x) = sqrt(3), one can utilize trigonometric identities rather than direct inverse functions. The equation sin(x/2) = 1/2 indicates that x/2 could be 30° or 150°, leading to potential values of x as 60° or 300°. The condition tan(x) = sqrt(3) suggests that x could also be 60° or 240°. By considering both conditions, the valid solutions for x within the range of 0 to 360° are 60° and 300°. Exploring the relationship between these angles and the properties of an equilateral triangle can provide further insights into the problem.
Anzas
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
find the angle x
if its known that:
sin(x/2) = 1/2
tan(x)=sqrt(3)

0<=x<=360
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why don't you simply do arcsine and arctan?
 
because the whole point of the question is using trigonometric identities to solve it (believe me i would be happy to do the arctan and get it over with :smile: )
 
Anzas said:
because the whole point of the question is using trigonometric identities to solve it (believe me i would be happy to do the arctan and get it over with :smile: )

You might discover something interesting about the problem though. (It's also worth noting that that there are special angles involved.)
 
i tried playing around with it

sin(x/2) = 1/2
tan(x)=sqrt(3)

i got

tan(x) = sin(x) / cos(x) = sqrt(3)

sin^2(x) / cos^2(x) = 3

but that didn't really lead me anywhere
i thought of ways to convert sin(x/2) to sin(x) with no luck
 
Anzas said:
find the angle x
if its known that:
sin(x/2) = 1/2
tan(x)=sqrt(3)

0<=x<=360

If you don't want to use the inverse trig functions directly then you may want to ponder the equilateral triangle!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top