Solving Angular Momentum Problem: Dividing by L/4 Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a conservation of angular momentum problem involving a bullet striking a rod, causing it to spin. The key point is that to calculate the angular momentum, the linear momentum of the bullet is multiplied by L/4, where L is the distance from the rod's center of mass to the point of impact. This multiplication reflects the relationship between linear and angular momentum, as the bullet's momentum contributes to the system's total angular momentum. It is clarified that the bullet retains some linear momentum after impact, and the angular momentum is calculated based on the bullet's position relative to the rod's center of mass. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems involving collisions and rotational motion.
paki123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I got a homework problem the other day, and it was a conservation of angular momentum problem. Basically a bullet hits a rod, and a rod starts to spin. I needed to find how fast the rod was rotating.

I didn't get the answer right, but I was looking up the answers, and it says that to convert it to the angular momentum, I had to divide my linear momentum by l/4(because the bullet strikes the rod l/4 over the center of mass.)

So it looked like this:

P = Linear Momentum = M(b)*V(b) + M(r)*V(r)

AM =Angular Momentum = (I(b)+I(r))*ω

P*L/4 = AM and then solve for ω
Why does dividing by L/4 get me to Angular momentum?

Or was initial momentum suppose to be covering linear momentum and angular momentum?

So Initial Momentum should have been (initial Linear momentum + initial Angular momentum )
and Final Momentum should have been (final linear momentum + final angular momentum)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer you've shown seems that it would only apply if the bullet completely stops after impact with the rod, a somewhat elastic collision. If the bullet continues to move after impact (including getting imbedded into the rod), then part of the angular and linear momentum of the system composed of bullet + rod remains in the bullet.

If the bullet completely stops, then it's linear momentum equals the impulse the bullet imparts to the rod. You can then treat the problem as an impulse applied to the rod at a point 1/4 the length of the rod away from the rod's center of mass.
 
I forgot to mention that. You are right, the bullet does get embedded into the rod. But I'm still not getting the intuition of why L/4 is being multiplied. Is there any connection between linear and angular momentum?
 
paki123 said:
P*L/4 = AM and then solve for ω
Why does dividing by L/4 get me to Angular momentum?
It's multiplying and not dividing.
P*L/4 is the angular momentum of the bullet (in respect to the center of mass) right before collision. What you have there is conservation of angular momentum for the collision.
You don't need to "convert" linear momentum to angular momentum. The bullet has both.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top