Solving Aperture Question Homework: Diameter of Pupil

  • Thread starter Thread starter toesockshoe
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the effective diameter of a pupil based on the ability to resolve pixels on a computer monitor. The context includes parameters such as the size of the monitor, pixel dimensions, and the distance from the monitor at which resolution is tested, with a focus on diffraction-limited resolvability.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the angle θ and the distance between pixels, questioning the appropriateness of the expressions used to define θ. There is exploration of the units involved and how they relate to the calculation of θ.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical relationships and concepts involved in the problem. Some have provided guidance on how to approach finding θ, while others are clarifying the assumptions and units necessary for the calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the final answer, but understanding of the concepts is being developed.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions regarding the correct use of distances in the calculations, particularly whether to use the distance to the screen or other values. The original poster expresses confusion about the results obtained, indicating potential misunderstandings in the application of the formulas.

toesockshoe
Messages
265
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement

A standard 14.16-inch (0.360-meter) computer monitor is 1024 pixels wide and 768 pixels tall. Each pixel is a square approximately 281micrometers on each side. Up close, you can see the individual pixels, but from a distance they appear to blend together and form the image on the screen.

If the maximum distance between the screen and your eyes at which you can just barely resolve two adjacent pixels is 1.30 meters, what is the effective diameter d of your pupil? Assume that the resolvability is diffraction-limited. Furthermore, use λ=550 nanometers as a characteristic optical wavelength.

Homework Equations



sin(\theta) = \frac{1.22* \lambda}{D}

The Attempt at a Solution



using small angle formula, you can assume sin(\theta) = \theta So, D = \frac {1.22 \lambda}{\theta}. \theta = \frac{281}{10^6} .. AND \lambda = \frac{550}{10^9}. Plugging all these values in, I get D=2.387 mm which is incorrect according to the homework checker. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
toesockshoe said:
##\theta = \frac{281}{10^6}##

Hello. Can you explain why the above expression represents θ? If you were to include units with your numbers, would you get the correct units for θ?
 
TSny said:
Hello. Can you explain why the above expression represents θ? If you were to include units with your numbers, would you get the correct units for θ?
It is 281micrometers/10^6 micrometers. This would be dimensionless which is a valid argument for theta.
 
It is equivalently 281 times 10^-6 m/1m.
 
toesockshoe said:
It is equivalently 281 times 10^-6 m/1m.
Why the 1 m in the denominator?
 
TSny said:
Why the 1 m in the denominator?
should it be 1.3m in the denominator instead? because tantheta is approx sin theta for small angles? ... i still don't get right answer.
 
Forget the numbers for a moment. Let's make sure we understand the concept. Can you describe in words how to find θ?
 
TSny said:
Forget the numbers for a moment. Let's make sure we understand the concept. Can you describe in words how to find θ?
yeah... you can use tan^-1(opposite/adjacent). opp is the distance between 2 pixels, and adj distance is the distance from you to the screen (which is 1.3). we have the opp distance and adj distance so we can find theta. units, cancel out because you are dividing meters/meters... and you have an acceptable angle measure.
 
OK, that will work for small angles. For small angles you can go on and approximate d/L by θ (in radians), where d is distance between pixels and L is distance from eye to pixels. So, yes, you should be dividing by 1.3 m.

I'm not sure why you are not getting the right answer now. What are you getting for D?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
TSny said:
OK, that will work for small angles. For small angles you can go on and approximate d/L by θ (in radians), where d is distance between pixels and L is distance from eye to pixels. So, yes, you should be dividing by 1.3 m.

I'm not sure why you are not getting the right answer now. What are you getting for D?
I got it. thank you.
 
  • #11
Good work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
25K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K