Solving Atwood Machine: m1 & m2 Reaching Floor & Ascending Height

AI Thread Summary
In the Atwood machine problem, the masses m1 (215g) and m2 (255g) are released from rest, with m2 descending 1.10m to the floor. The calculated acceleration of the system is approximately 0.851 m/s², leading to a time of 1.61 seconds for m2 to reach the floor. Once m2 hits the ground, m1 continues to ascend until the string goes slack, transitioning to projectile motion. To solve for the height m1 ascends, additional equations and considerations of its velocity at the moment m2 impacts the ground are necessary. Understanding the forces acting on m1 post-launch is crucial for determining its maximum height.
DmytriE
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One mass, m1 = 215g, of an ideal Atwood machine rests on the floor 1.10m below the other mass, m2 = 255g. (a) If the masses are released from rest, how long does it take m2 to reach the floor? (b) How high will mass m1 ascend from the floor?

Known variables:
m1 = 215g = 0.215kg = F1
m2 = 255g = 0.255kg = F2
yd = 1.10m

Homework Equations


F2 - F1 = (m1 + m2)a
yd = v0t + 1/2at2

The Attempt at a Solution



A.
2.5N - 2.1N = (0.255kg + 0.215kg)*a
0.4N = 0.47kg*a
a = 0.851m/s2

1.10m = 1/2*(0.851m/s2)*t2
t = 1.61s

B. I think I have to use equation 'b' in the relevant equations section but I do not know how to use it properly. For this part I have the masses or each object, the acceleration of the entire apparatus, and the different forces. Any insight on this problem would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DmytriE.

You might want to keep a few more decimal places in your intermediate values so that rounding errors don't creep into your results.

You may need to think about recruiting some additional equations for part (B). When m2 hits the floor at the time t that you've calculated, what happens to the forces acting on m1? What's m1's state of motion at that instant?
 
That's the problem. I don't know what other equations I need to use to figure out this problem. This is what I have:

a = 0.834 m/s2
v0 = 0 m/s
t = 1.62s
x = 1.10 m

As m2 is accelerating downward toward the ground m1 is accelerating upward. It will continue to accelerate for 1.10m (the point where m2 hits the ground) and then m1 begins to slow down.

xm1 = 1.10 + the distance it takes for a = 0.

Maybe I should be looking at a different acceleration for m1 since it's lighter than m2? m1 should accelerate quicker than m2.


NOTE: I have just graduated college with a BA in biochemistry. This is no longer homework for me but an interest and a learning experience. I will not be getting homework points. :smile:
 
DmytriE said:
That's the problem. I don't know what other equations I need to use to figure out this problem. This is what I have:

a = 0.834 m/s2
v0 = 0 m/s
t = 1.62s
x = 1.10 m

As m2 is accelerating downward toward the ground m1 is accelerating upward. It will continue to accelerate for 1.10m (the point where m2 hits the ground) and then m1 begins to slow down.

xm1 = 1.10 + the distance it takes for a = 0.

Maybe I should be looking at a different acceleration for m1 since it's lighter than m2? m1 should accelerate quicker than m2.

As long as the Atwood machine's parts are free from external interference they will move together -- the same velocity and the same acceleration. The string will remain tensioned.

When m2 hits the floor, m1 continues its upward journey and the string (presumably the much vaunted "light inextensible string" of physics folklore) will go slack. At this point m1 is behaving as a projectile fired upwards with whatever velocity it had attained immediately before m2 hit the floor. So to go further you need:

1. The height when m1 is "launched" (you have this)
2. The velocity of m1 when it is "launched"
3. The new situation for forces acting on m1 after launch
4. Appropriate projectile motion equations (Hint: conservation of energy would help here)

NOTE: I have just graduated college with a BA in biochemistry. This is no longer homework for me but an interest and a learning experience. I will not be getting homework points. :smile:

That's most commendable. Won't change what happens here though! :smile:
 
I understand gneill. Your post had me look at the problem in an entirely different way. Thanks!

Sometimes a day or two off helps reset the brain.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top