Solving Biot-Savarts Law for Finite Thickness Current Loops

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

When solving Biot-Savarts law for a current loop of radius R, the magnetic field on the axis of the loop is given by (in Tesla)
[tex] B(z) = \mu_0I\frac{R^2}{(R^2+z^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]
where I is the current through the loop. However, this derivation assumes that the loop has an infinitesimal thickness. But how is the "proper" way to take into account the fact that a current loops has a finite thickness?

My book on Electrodynamics (Griffiths) does not address this issue, and it is something I have thought about for some time.Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
Hi

When solving Biot-Savarts law for a current loop of radius R, the magnetic field on the axis of the loop is given by (in Tesla)
[tex] B(z) = \mu_0I\frac{R^2}{(R^2+z^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]
where I is the current through the loop. However, this derivation assumes that the loop has an infinitesimal thickness. But how is the "proper" way to take into account the fact that a current loops has a finite thickness?

My book on Electrodynamics (Griffiths) does not address this issue, and it is something I have thought about for some time.


Niles.

I suppose by carrying out a more sophisticated integration where,perhaps,the thick coil can be considered as a number of narrow coils connected side by side and making good electrical contact with each other.

(Is your equation missing a 2pi?)
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
978
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K