Solving Boundary Conditions for Electric Field in Dielectric Media

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the electric field in two dielectric regions separated by the z=0 plane, with given permittivities and an electric field in region 1. The key boundary conditions are that the tangential components of the electric fields must be equal (E1t = E2t) and the difference in the displacement fields must relate to surface charge density (D1 - D2 = ρs). The participants emphasize the importance of visualizing the problem in three dimensions to understand the relationship between the electric field vectors at the interface. The conclusion drawn is that only the normal component of the electric field changes across the boundary, while the tangential components remain the same. This understanding aids in determining the electric field in region 2 based on the known values from region 1.
Electro
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Greetings everyone:
I'm trying to solve a problem which requires finding the electric field. I've been pondering on this problem for a while but still no results. The book doesn't give any hints or clues on how to tackle this kind of problems so I would really appreciate some of your suggestions.

Assume that the z= 0 plane separates two lossless diaelectric regions with Epsilon(r1) = 2 and Epsilon(r2)=3. If we know that E1 in region 1 is 2y i - 3x j + (5+z) k, what is E2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the boundary conditions on the electric field at the interface between the two dielectric regions?
 
Thanks Siddharth, but if we draw a picture of the two media, geometrically we can conclude that E1t = E2t where E1t=E1-E1n and the same with E2t (I guess you get the picture). I don't see how this would help. Moreover we are dealing with 3-D ( I guess I might have understood it if it was 2-D).
Thanks

I'm editing the post: Thanks for your help, I understand it now.
 
Last edited:
Electro said:
Thanks Siddharth, but if we draw a picture of the two media, geometrically we can conclude that E1t = E2t where E1t=E1-E1n and the same with E2t (I guess you get the picture). I don't see how this would help. Moreover we are dealing with 3-D ( I guess I might have understood it if it was 2-D).
Thanks

I'm actually dealing with a similar problem right now. The way I understand it, is that the two boundary conditions are:

E_{1t} = E_{2t}
\vec a _{n2} \cdot (\vec D_1 - \vec D_2) = \rho_s

For the first one,
E_{1t} = E_{2t} means the tangential components are the same. This tripped me up a bit... and I'm still a little uneasy doing these problems. Anyhow you have a plane that separates the media z = 0. So what can you say about the relationship between all the vectors of \vec E_1(x,y,z=0) and \vec E_2(x,y,z=0).
All of those vectors are tangential to the interface. So you can conclude that only the normal component (in this case it would be E_{z2},) is going to change when crossing the interface. Since you know that the tangential components are the same (from the relation above), you are left with:

\vec E_2 = \vec a_x E_{1x} + \vec a_y E_{1y} + \vec a_z \bar E_{2z}

where the bar was used for emphasis on\bar E_{2z} (the z component of the vector).
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top