Solving Bug Sliding In Bowl: Friction & Potential Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter xXmarkXx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bug
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bug sliding back and forth in a frictionless bowl with a sticky patch that introduces friction. The bug starts from rest at the top of the bowl, which is 11 cm deep, and the question focuses on how many times the bug crosses the sticky region, given the coefficient of friction and the dimensions of the patch.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the energy changes as the bug crosses the sticky patch, particularly how kinetic energy is affected by friction. There are inquiries about calculating work done and the forces involved, including gravitational and frictional forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the relationship between energy loss due to friction and the bug's subsequent height after crossing the sticky patch. There is an ongoing dialogue about the calculations involved, including the use of work-energy principles and the implications of mass in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the initial total energy and how to account for energy loss after each crossing of the sticky patch. The problem setup includes specific values for height and friction, but the mass of the bug is not provided, leading to discussions about its impact on calculations.

xXmarkXx
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bug slides back and forth in a bowl 11 cm ddep, starting from rest at the top. The bowl is frictionless except for a 1.5 cm wide sticky patch on its flat bottom, where the coefficient of frictino is .61. How many times does the bug cross the sticky region?

Anybody have any ideas. I can't find an equation that uses the coefficient of friction and potential energy...
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Mark, welcome to the forums!

What happens to the total energy of the bug when it crosses the sticky patch?
 
Thanks for the welcome.

It will decrease, the kenetic energy is at its peek when it reaches the patch, but the total energy will decrease after it passes the 1.5 in sticky area.
 
xXmarkXx said:
It will decrease, the kenetic energy is at its peek when it reaches the patch, but the total energy will decrease after it passes the 1.5 in sticky area.

Exactly! Some work is being done on the bug to decrease its energy. How would you calculate this work done?
 
The integral of Fnetdx?
 
xXmarkXx said:
The integral of Fnetdx?

Mmm...you wouldn't actually need an integral here, but the principle's the same.
The force is constant (what is it?), and (presumably) it's going to travel in a straight line of 1.5 cm. So it boils to down to the simpler version, W = F(net)d.
 
neutrino said:
Mmm...you wouldn't actually need an integral here, but the principle's the same.
The force is constant (what is it?), and (presumably) it's going to travel in a straight line of 1.5 cm. So it boils to down to the simpler version, W = F(net)d.


Well, we have a gravitational force, weight...and we also have the kenetic friction. It's weight is constant, but we don't know its weight because we don't have a mass.
 
In the patch, the gravitational force is balanced by the normal force. The net force is due to friction.

Actually, you don't need to know the mass. Once you look at the problem in its "entirety," the mass will vanish, so to speak.

The bug starts with some energy at the top, then loses some in the sticky patch, and then it goes to the other side with less energy than it started with, and hence to a smaller height. All you need to know is that second height, and then repeat the process again (and again).
 
neutrino said:
In the patch, the gravitational force is balanced by the normal force. The net force is due to friction.

Actually, you don't need to know the mass. Once you look at the problem in its "entirety," the mass will vanish, so to speak.

The bug starts with some energy at the top, then loses some in the sticky patch, and then it goes to the other side with less energy than it started with, and hence to a smaller height. All you need to know is that second height, and then repeat the process again (and again).


I'm confused, so i take the work from the friction, and subtract that from the total energy..and then solve for height2?
My Fnet is equal to (ma+Fsubk) right?
And you said W=(Fnet)d. What is d?
 
  • #10
xXmarkXx said:
so i take the work from the friction, and subtract that from the total energy..and then solve for height2?
That's right.

My Fnet is equal to (ma+Fsubk) right?
I assume Fsubk refers to the force due to kinetic friction.

Fnet = Fk. What's the force due to friction?

And you said W=(Fnet)d. What is d?

Dispalcement (or distance). Work = Force.Displacement. Remember, the force and displacement are in opposite directions.
 
  • #11
neutrino said:
That's right.


I assume Fsubk refers to the force due to kinetic friction.

Fnet = Fk. What's the force due to friction?



Dispalcement (or distance). Work = Force.Displacement. Remember, the force and displacement are in opposite directions.

Fk=ukn where n is the normal force or the opposite of weight in this case.

So the displacement is going to be 1.5cm?
 
  • #12
Yes. I think you now have enough info to solve for the height on the other side of the bowl. :smile:
 
  • #13
neutrino said:
Yes. I think you now have enough info to solve for the height on the other side of the bowl. :smile:


Ok, so i solved for work. W=-.915mg. Can i use U=mgh and then substitute U/h in for mg?? And i don't know my initial total energy. I'm still a little confused.
 
  • #14
xXmarkXx said:
Ok, so i solved for work. W=-.915mg.
Okay, that's how much it lost to friction.

Can i use U=mgh and then substitute U/h in for mg??

And i don't know my initial total energy. I'm still a little confused.

Let's say it started off at height h (which is eqaul to 11 cm, in this case). Therfore initial energy is mgh; it loses .915mg, and with the remaining energy goes up the other side to some height, say h'. Can you solve for h'?

After that, it repeats the same thing again, but with "initial" energy decreased every time.
 
  • #15
neutrino said:
Okay, that's how much it lost to friction.



Let's say it started off at height h (which is eqaul to 11 cm, in this case). Therfore initial energy is mgh; it loses .915mg, and with the remaining energy goes up the other side to some height, say h'. Can you solve for h'?

After that, it repeats the same thing again, but with "initial" energy decreased every time.


Ok, so i start off with 11mg. Now i minus .915mg until i reach 0? I got it. Because it loses .915mg of energy every time it passes the sticky spot. So i minus that from the total each time it passes until the sticky spot completely stops the bug. Thanks for your help!
 
  • #16
Great!

Glad to help. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K