Solving Cancer Tumours w/ High Energy Ions

  • Thread starter Thread starter acpyrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of high-energy ions to target cancer tumors, specifically how to calculate the necessary acceleration to achieve a 2.0 cm sideways deflection across the tumor. The ions travel at a speed of 5.0 x 10^6 m/s and are directed through an acceleration region of 5.0 cm between charged plates. Key calculations include determining the required acceleration, the sideways deflection upon exiting the plates, and the resulting velocities and trajectory of the ions. The goal is to ensure that the total sideways deflection equals 2.0 cm for effective tumor targeting. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing treatment methods in cancer therapy.
acpyrus
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I would appreciate some hints in how to get started with this problem:

You are asked to consult for the city's research hospital, where a group of doctors is investigating the bombardment of cancer tumours with high energy ions. The ions are fired directly toward the center of the tumour at speeds of 5.0 x 10^6 m/s. To cover the entire area, the ions are deflected sideways by passing them between two charged metal plates that accelerate the ions perpendicular to the direction of their initial motion. The acceleration region is 5.0 cm long, and the ends of the acceleration plates are 1.5 m from the patient. What acceleration is required to move an ion 2.0 cm across the tumour?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let a_p be the acceleration across the plates.
When the electron has reached the end of the plates, what is the sideways deflection ?
What are its velocities at this point, and at what direction, to the inital direction of motion, is it traveling ?
After having passed through the plates, what is the motion of the electron now ?
Can you track this motion such that the total sideways deflection is 2.0 cm ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top