Solving Circuits: Fig. 27-65 Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter KTiaam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Circuits
AI Thread Summary
In the circuit analysis of Fig. 27-65, the initial conditions involve a 1.2 kV source and a capacitor that is initially uncharged. Upon closing the switch at t = 0, the currents through the resistors can be determined using loop equations and Ohm's law. The discussion highlights that at t = 0, the capacitor behaves like a short circuit, simplifying the analysis to a voltage divider approach for calculating the potential across the resistors. After many time constants (t = ∞), the capacitor acts as an open circuit, allowing for straightforward current calculations. The voltage divider method is recommended for efficiently finding the currents and potential differences in the circuit.
KTiaam
Messages
53
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

In the circuit of Fig. 27-65, = 1.2 kV, C = 6.5 μF, R1 = R2 = R3 = 0.73 MΩ. With C completely uncharged, switch S is suddenly closed (at t 0). At t = 0, what are (a) current i1 in resistor 1, (b) current i2 in resistor 2, and (c) current i3 in resistor 3? At t = ∞ (that is, after many time constants), what are (d) i1, (e) i2, and (f) i3? What is the potential difference V2 across resistor 2 at (g) t = 0 and (h) t = ∞? (i) Sketch V2 versus t between these two extreme times.

The Attempt at a Solution


i have loop equations down as:
i1 = i2 + i3
E - i1R -i2R = 0
i2R - i3Ri don't understand how they get the answer
i1 = 2/3(v/r)

Ive also attached the steps shown from the solution manual:
thanks for all you help
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-04-20 at 11.57.12 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-20 at 11.57.12 AM.png
    18.6 KB · Views: 1,640
  • Screen Shot 2014-04-20 at 12.06.15 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-20 at 12.06.15 PM.png
    11 KB · Views: 1,630
  • Like
Likes ilker29
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why they went so far as to solve simultaneous equations for this problem. Really, since the at the times of interest the capacitor either looks like a short circuit or an open circuit, the result is a simple voltage dividers to find the potential at the switch. With that potential in hand the currents in the resistors is straightforward Ohm's law.

If you take the voltage divider approach you should find their expression for i1 quite easily.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top