Solving Coulomb Triangle: Find Unknown Charge q

  • Thread starter Thread starter jg95ae
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a Coulomb triangle problem to find the unknown charge q, given that the net force on a 1.0 mC charge is zero. The configuration includes two 2.0 mC charges at the base and the unknown charge at the top, with a central charge positioned between them. Participants discuss calculating the x and y components of forces acting on the central charge, emphasizing that the unknown charge must be positive to counteract the upward resultant force from the other two charges. After recalculating the forces, it is concluded that the unknown charge q should be approximately +0.865 mC, confirming its positive nature due to the need for repulsion. The discussion clarifies that the force from the unknown charge acts solely in the y direction, with no x-component involved.
jg95ae
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to figure this problem out for quite awhile but am really struggling, help would be much appreciated. Thank you


In the diagram to the right, the net force on the 1.0 mC charge is zero. What is the sign and magnitude of the unknown charge q?

So the diagram is a triangle, which has two charges on the bottom, each 2.0mC, and 8 cm apart. The top is the unknown q, which from the middle of the triangle is 6cm up. And there is a 1.0mC charge in the centre of the triangle which is 3 cm up. (I have attached the diagram)

Based on the measurements given, I'm first trying to come up with the x and y components for each of the forces. And this is where I'm already having difficulties. Q1 is bottom left, Q2 unknown top, Q3 bottom right, Q4 centre

F12 = -F12xcos(theta)- F12ysin(theta)
F13 = -F13x
F14 = -F14xcos(theta)+ F14ysin(theta)

x: -F12cos(theta)- F13 + F14cos(theta) = 0

y: -F12sin(theta) + F14sin(theta) = 0

Can anyone tell me if this looks remotely ok so far?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Well generally a good procedure (well what I was taught and it is straight forward) is to first draw the force vectors. That is, draw the force vector of the force of Q1 on Q4. Then draw the force vector of Q3 on Q4.
Just from doing this you see that the resultant force vector (excluding Q2 at the moment) is upwards. So you can see that Q2 will have to be positive to provide a repulsive force in the opposite direction to the resultant force from Q1 and Q3 on Q4.

Then calculate the magnitude of the force vectors for Q1 and Q3 on Q4.

F14=(kq1q4)/r^2 = (kq1q4)/(0.05)^2

Where r was calculated using Pythagoras' Theorem.

Do this for Q3 on Q4 as well. Remembering that you are only interested in the magnitude at this stage (not direction).

You don't need to worry about calculating the x-component 'cause from symmetry you can see that the x-components of Q1 and Q3 will cancel each other and Q2 doesn't contribute any force in the x direction.

So all you need to worry about is the y-component of the force. Since you have the magnitude of the forces from Q1 and Q3 you can find the y-components by multiplying the magnitude of the forces with sin(theta).

y: F14y + F34y - F24y = 0

From this you can see that the y components of F14 and F34 are added since I've taken the upwards force to be positive. Solve for F24 and you have your solution.
 
Ok so for F14 & F34 = 7.2 x 10^8

I found the angle for each of these to be 36.9 degrees, therefore F14 & F34 x sin(36.9) both = 4.32 x 10^8

Based on big man's y component F14y and F34y add together to get F24 = 8.65 x 10^8

So based on a top angle with Q24 of 33.7 I found Q2 to be 0.16 C.

To me this doesn't seem right as its so much larger than any of the other charges?
 
It's not quite right.

With F14 and F34 you should have a magnitude of the order of 10^6 rather than of 10^8.

F14 = (k*q1*q4)/0.05^2 = (8.99*10^9)*(0.002*0.001)/0.0025 = 7.19*10^6

The magnitude of F34 will obviously be the same.

Now you got the angle right and so F14y and F34y will be the same and will be:

F14*sin(36.9).

Then solving for q2 you should get a number that is slightly less than q4.

I don't know what the "top angle with Q24" means 'cause q2 is lying on the same line as q4, meaning that all of it's force is directed along the y direction.

ie y component= F14y + F34y -F24 = 0
ie 2*F14*sin(36.9) - k*(q2*q4)/r1^2 = 0

Where r1 is the distance between q2 and q4 (0.03 m).
So yeah you were right that 0.16 C didn't make sense :)
 
Ok so based on this I found Q2 to be +0.865 C which seems to be a more appropriate number. Am I correct in saying that it is positive?

But I'm not sure that I understand why there is no angle, is it because the vector has only a y-component and so it just equals the force?
 
I assume you meant that it was +0.865 mC or around there.

Yes you are right in saying that it is positive because it has to provide a repulsion force so that it 'cancels' out the y-component forces from q1 and q3.

There is no angle because q2 and q4 are lying on the same axis. This means that the force of q2 on q4 will only be directed along that axis, which means that there will be no x-component. So reiterating the point...there is no force in the x direction, all the force from q2 is being directed in the y direction only.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top