Solving Determinant Question for 3A2B-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
i am given 2 matrices

A=
a1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c1
a3 b3 c3

B=
-c2 3c1 -c3
b2 -3b1 b3
-5a2 15a1 -5a3


and also given is: 5detA+detB=10

what i need to fin is det(3A2B-1)

what i did to help me was

det(3)=27
det(A2)=detA*detA
det(B-1)=1/detB

i see that if i perform 2 "swaps" on B, once between R1 and R3 , and then between C1 and C2, these actions won't change detB.
now i can divide my new R1 by 5, and my new c1 by 3 and transpose B to get a new B* , detB=(5*3)detB*

now my new matrix B* is ALMOST identical to A, except for the (-) signs before some of its numbers, which are drivin me mad,
how can i get rid of them, if i can get rid of them i can find detA.

any ideas? have all my steps beeen legal??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a1 -a2 -a3
-b1 b2 b3
c1 -c2 -c3

Find "patterns" in the negative signs so you can multiply certain rows or columns by -1 to get rid of them.
 
thanks, got it.. so...
what i had was

B*=
a1 -b1 c1
-a2 b2 -c2
-a3 b3 -c3

so i'll multiply det(B*)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1)=detA
so detB* =-detA

detB=(5*3)detB*
detB=-15detA


5detA+detB=10
5detA-15detA=10
detA=-1

now to solve the question
det(3A^2B^-1)=27*(-1)*(-1)*(1/-15)
=-27/15

does this all look right??
 
Dell said:
thanks, got it.. so...
what i had was

B*=
a1 -b1 c1
-a2 b2 -c2
-a3 b3 -c3

so i'll multiply det(B*)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1)=detA
so detB* =-detA

detB=(5*3)detB*
detB=-15detA5detA+detB=10
5detA-15detA=10
detA=-1

now to solve the question
det(3A^2B^-1)=27*(-1)*(-1)*(1/-15)
=-27/15

does this all look right??
Right up until to the very end! Since det(A)=-1 and det(B) = -15det(A), we have det(B) = +15.

Apart from that - well done, Dell!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top