Solving Dimension Matching Problem with Brad - 65 Characters

  • Thread starter Thread starter brad sue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a dimension matching problem involving the relationship between the period τ, pendulum length l, and gravitational acceleration g. The user initially struggles with the dimensional analysis but is guided to express l and g in their dimensional forms. By setting up equations for the exponents based on the dimensional equation T1 = L^r * T^(-2s), the user finds the necessary relationships: 1 = -2s and 0 = r + s. Ultimately, the user successfully derives that τ is proportional to (l/g)^(1/2). The exchange highlights the importance of correctly handling dimensions in physics problems.
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a problem about dimension matchig.

the dimensional relation between the period τ , the pendul length l, and the acceleration of the gravity g takes the form:
[ τ ]=[l^r] [g^s]

Use the fact that the dimendion of τ is [T], that of l is [L], and that of g is [L/T^2] to show that

τ is proportional to (l/g)^(1/2)

I don't get the soltuion right...
Thank you

brad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show what you did. (Start by replacing l and g with their dimensional equivalents.)
 
Doc Al said:
Show what you did. (Start by replacing l and g with their dimensional equivalents.)

Lr*Ls/T2s equivalent to


Lr*Ls/T-2s . from here I get lost in my calculation I tried to separated the exponent of T into T-s*T-s but really it does not make sense to me.
please give me some hint so I can go further

Thank
Brad
 
You have T1 = Lr*Ls*T-2s. So now you can set up equations for the exponents:
1 = -2s
0 = r + s (note that having no L factor is equivalent to having L0)
 
Thank you SO much!

I got the solution now

Doc Al said:
You have T1 = Lr*Ls*T-2s. So now you can set up equations for the exponents:
1 = -2s
0 = r + s (note that having no L factor is equivalent to having L0)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top