Solving Eigenvectors for Root -7 of 2x3 Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter 939
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvector Sign
939
Messages
110
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Find eigenvector for the root -7 of:

|2 3|
|3 -6|

Homework Equations



|2 3|
|3 -6|

The Attempt at a Solution



I got
1
-3

But my books says
-1
3

I am only wondering if this is possibly the same answer, because when I check my answer by multiplying the eigenvector by the original matrix and the root by the eigenvector the answer appears correct.

I.e.
|2 3|
|3 -6| times (1/-3) = (-7)(1/-3) = -7/21, while if you do the same for (-1/3), allbeit a different answer, but the condition still holds.

Is this correct? Is this condition truly the indicator of if you got the correct answer? (original vector * eigenvector) = (root * eigenvector)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, any "eigenvector", v, corresponding to a given eigenvalue (I would not say "root") \lambda, of matrix A, has the property that Av= \lambda v.

What you are missing is that if v is such an eigenvector then av, for any number a, is also an eigenvector, corresponding to eigenvalue \lambda: A(av)= a (Av)= a(\lambda v)= \lambda (av).

In particular, with a= -1, if v is an eigenvalue then so is -v. The eigenvector is NOT unique.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, any "eigenvector", v, corresponding to a given eigenvalue (I would not say "root") \lambda, of matrix A, has the property that Av= \lambda v.

What you are missing is that if v is such an eigenvector then av, for any number a, is also an eigenvector, corresponding to eigenvalue \lambda: A(av)= a (Av)= a(\lambda v)= \lambda (av).

In particular, with a= -1, if v is an eigenvalue then so is -v. The eigenvector is NOT unique.

Thanks a lot.

Just to confirm, the signs in this case do not matter and both answers are correct? I am such a noobie...
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top