Solving Einstein Equation Confusion: My Notes vs Freidmann Equations

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
My notes for a particular course say that G_{ab} - \Lambda g_{ab}= x T_{ab} where x=\frac{8 \pi G}{c^4}
Then they say that the trace of this is -R+4 \Lambda=xT
What?
Surely that's only possible if we have +\Lambda g_{ab} as I have seen in every other text I've ever read?

However, when we derive the Freidmann equations from this we get a ( \frac{\dot{a}}{a})^2=\frac{8 \pi G}{3} \rho -\frac{k}{a^2}+\frac{\Lambda}{3}
So if we had -\Lambda on the LHS as suggested in the notes then this will come over to the RHS and give a + as required by the Freidmann equations but now it is all inconsistent with the trace.

This is so confusing! Can anyone clear this up? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure it isn't

G_{ab} + \Lambda g_{ab}= \frac{8 \pi G}{c^4}<br /> T_{ab}

in the original Equation, that is, +Λ instead of -Λ on the left-hand side?

In case your textbook/notes actually state -Λ, then there's a strong possibility of it being a typo, and in this case, just ignore it.

I'd also recommend you to notify your tutor/professor on this.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top