latentcorpse
- 1,411
- 0
ok if you could just tell em if this sounds alright.
(i) A large horizontal sheet of surface charge density \sigma has a hole of radius b cout out of it. Find the electric field directly above the centre of the hole.
I already have expressions for the electric field due to the sheet and the disc of radius b on their own - can i just use the principle of superposition to subtract the field of the disc of radius b from the field of the sheet to get the total electric field?
(ii) By applying a Gaussian pillbox to an infinitely large charged sheet of surface charge density \sigma, I obtained \vec{E(z)} = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \vec{z} for the electric field. I am now asked why this field would double if the same charge were placed on the surface of a conductor.
I have a feeling this is because in the conductor the charges inside arrange themselves to give a net internal field of 0 and then this arrangement of the charges would cause a field to be generated outside the conductor equal to the initial external field, hence doubling it as a result of the superposition principle.
How do these ideas sound?
(i) A large horizontal sheet of surface charge density \sigma has a hole of radius b cout out of it. Find the electric field directly above the centre of the hole.
I already have expressions for the electric field due to the sheet and the disc of radius b on their own - can i just use the principle of superposition to subtract the field of the disc of radius b from the field of the sheet to get the total electric field?
(ii) By applying a Gaussian pillbox to an infinitely large charged sheet of surface charge density \sigma, I obtained \vec{E(z)} = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \vec{z} for the electric field. I am now asked why this field would double if the same charge were placed on the surface of a conductor.
I have a feeling this is because in the conductor the charges inside arrange themselves to give a net internal field of 0 and then this arrangement of the charges would cause a field to be generated outside the conductor equal to the initial external field, hence doubling it as a result of the superposition principle.
How do these ideas sound?