Solving equations with greatest integer function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 13K views
Bea77
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I can't find a step by step explanation for solving these types of equations

eg.
99 = [2x+1]/3


Homework Equations



eg.
99 = [2x+1]/3

or

48 = 4[2x/3]

How do you handle the multipliers iand constants inside the brackets?
thx
3. The Attempt at a Solution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about how the greatest integer function works. For example,

[tex] \lfloor 3.2 \rfloor = \lfloor 3.582 \rfloor = 3[/tex]

and in fact, if [tex]3 \le x < 4[/tex] it is true that

[tex] \lfloor x \rfloor = 3[/tex]

So, if you know that

[tex] \frac{\lfloor 2x+1\rfloor}{3} = 99[/tex]

you also know that

[tex] \lfloor 2x+1 \rfloor = 297[/tex]

(the [tex]3[/tex] in the denominator is not in the function). What does the final
statement above tell you about how large [tex]2x + 1[/tex] must be?
 
statdad said:
Think about how the greatest integer function works. For example,

[tex] \lfloor 3.2 \rfloor = \lfloor 3.582 \rfloor = 3[/tex]

and in fact, if [tex]3 \le x < 4[/tex] it is true that

[tex] \lfloor x \rfloor = 3[/tex]

So, if you know that

[tex] \frac{\lfloor 2x+1\rfloor}{3} = 99[/tex]

you also know that

[tex] \lfloor 2x+1 \rfloor = 297[/tex]

(the [tex]3[/tex] in the denominator is not in the function). What does the final
statement above tell you about how large [tex]2x + 1[/tex] must be?

--------------------
so 297 <= 2x+1 < 298

296 <=2x and 2x < 297
148 <=x and x < 148.5

Did I get it?
 
statdad said:
Yup.


Thanks!