Solving Excess Charge Problem at Point 1

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the electric field strength at a point due to an excess negative charge on a conducting box. The surface density of excess electrons is given as 31 x 10^10 electrons/m^2. The charge is calculated using the formula q = Ne, resulting in 5 x 10^-8 C/m^2. Dividing this charge by the permittivity constant (8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2) yields an electric field strength of approximately 5604.5 N/C. The calculations and units have been confirmed as correct.
jincy34
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The conducting box has been given an excess negative charge. The surface density of excess electrons at the center of the top surface is 31 x 10^10 electrons/m^2. What is the electric field strength at point 1?
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/680/knightfigure27262bn2.jpg

Homework Equations



E = linear charge density/E0
linear charge density=q/L
q=N(e)

The Attempt at a Solution


First I found the charge
q=Ne
=(31*10^10 electrons/m^2)*(1.6*10^-19)
=5*10^-8 C/m^2
E=(5*10^-8 electrons/m^2)/(8.85*10^-12)
=5604.5
Can someone please conform if am right ?
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_27_26-2.jpg
    knight_Figure_27_26-2.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 1,057
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
please upload your images at a service like http://imageshack.us or http://bayimg.com . We are not able to see your attachment as it is pending approval...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is correct. We can double check by looking at the units. Finding the charge gives us:

q=Ne=(31*10^10 electrons/m^2)*(1.6*10^-19 C/electron)
=5*10^-8 C/m^2

Than dividing by the permittivity constant, 8.85*10^-12 C^2/Nm^s gets the units into the units of electric field, N/C
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top