Solving Exponential and Spring Constant Problems in Physics | Need Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jammy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinning
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two main physics problems: calculating the probability of decay of a substance and determining the spring constant from oscillation data. For the decay problem, the method involves using the half-life to derive the probability of decay over a shorter time frame, specifically one second. In addressing the spring constant, clarification is needed on whether the mass refers to the spring itself or a mass attached to it, with the formula for the period of harmonic motion provided as a potential solution. Participants express confusion over the questions and suggest looking up relevant formulas in physics textbooks. The conversation highlights the challenges faced when tackling these fundamental physics concepts.
Jammy
My heads spinning help!

As usual I've left my work to the end of the holiday and after 2 hours of physics questions my head is in a spin... i have a cou[ple of simple quetions where i know the soluion isobvious but i can't get my had around the answers... would anyone be able to point me in the right direction so i can answer them?

Changes in exponential:
1) how wold i go about working out the probability of decay of a substance in 1 second.I have been given a half life and a decay rate.


Spring constants:
2) I have been given the mass of a spring and the time for oscillations --> how do i work out the spring constant? I know f=kx but i am really confused

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Changes in exponential:
1) how wold i go about working out the probability of decay of a substance in 1 second.I have been given a half life and a decay rate.
I'm not sure what you mean by a decay rate. Decay decreases exponentially with time, so it is not constant. Unless your decay rate was given in terms of t^2.

Anyway, if a sample has a half life of an hour, then an individual nucleus of the sample will have a 50% chance (or 0.5) of decaying in that time. All you need to do then is change that two hours to one second and you have the answer.

50% in two hours
25% in 60 minutes
25/60= 5/12% chance of decaying in one minute
divide by 60 again for probability in one second.

Hope that helps
 
Sorry for the double post, but just wanted to say that the two hour half life I used as an example was just invented and you should replace that with the half life they gave you in the question and get down to one second in a similar manner to me.
 


Originally posted by Jammy

Spring constants:
2) I have been given the mass of a spring and the time for oscillations --> how do i work out the spring constant? I know f=kx but i am really confused

I am confused, too. Are you sure you have been given the mass of the spring; or is it a mass hanging from a spring. The latter is the usual type of problem dealing with idealized springs. Look up period of harmonic motion in your text. You will find

T = 2<pi>(m/k)^(1/2)

Feel free to visit my website for more help.
 


Originally posted by Jammy
... the probability of decay of a substance in 1 second.

... the mass of a spring and the time for oscillations --> how do i work out the spring constant?
It is not clear what is meant by the "probability of decay of a substance." Do you mean, "probability that a decay will occur in a substance composed of constituents that are prone to decay?"

You probably mean mass on the end of the spring. There is probably a formula in your book for this. Oh wait. Based on the two questions you asked which don't seem to have anything to do with each other, you're probably using the worst intro phys book I've ever seen. I don't remeber the author or title, but the ones that I have seen have a picture of a waterfall or something like that on the front. It gives extremely brief treatments of QM, thermo, relativity, and such in an extremely oversimplified manner, with utter disconnectedness. If that is the book you are using, I feel sorry for you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top