Solving Extrasolar Planet Orbital Radius & Angular Displacement Problems

Fahad Jan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
An extrasolar planet can be detected by observing the wobble it produces on the star around which it revolves. Suppose an extrasolar planet of mass mb revolves around its star of mass ma . If no external force acts on this simple two-object system, then its CM is stationary. Assume ma and mb are in circular orbits with radii ra and rb about the system's CM.

(a) Show that ra =(mb/ma)rb

(b) Now consider a Sun-like star and a single planet with the same characteristics as Jupiter. That is, mb = (1.0 x 10-3)ma and the planet has an orbital radius of 8.0 x 1011 meters. Determine the radius ra of the star's orbit about the system's CM.

(c) When viewed from Earth, the distant system appears to wobble over a distance of 2ra . If astronomers are able to detect angular displacements ? of about 1 milliarcsec (1 arcsec = 1/3600 of a degree), from what distance d (in light years) can the star's wobble be detected (1 ly = 9.46 x 1015 m)?

(d) That star nearest to our Sun is about 4 ly away. Assuming stars are uniformly distributed throughout our region of the Milky Way Galaxy, about how many stars can this technique be applied to in the search for extrasolar planetary systems?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top