Solving f(x)=0: Horizontal Asymptote

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boom101
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function f(x) = 2 / (x + 3) and its horizontal and vertical asymptotic behavior. Participants explore the implications of the function's form and the behavior of the graph as x approaches certain values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for parentheses in the function's notation, which affects the interpretation of asymptotes. There is an exploration of the function's behavior as x approaches -3 and as x becomes very large or very negative. Questions arise regarding the necessity of analyzing intervals of increase/decrease and concavity in relation to limits and asymptotic behavior.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the function's asymptotic behavior and clarified misconceptions about the y-intercept. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the function's intervals of increase/decrease and its limits near vertical asymptotes.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the correct interpretation of the function due to the absence of parentheses, which has led to different assumptions about its asymptotic properties. The original poster acknowledges an error in their initial statement about the function.

Boom101
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


f(x) = 2 / x + 3

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


Nvm I'm an idiot. Y=0 is a horizontal asymptote
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Going by the assumption that you mean f(x) = \frac{2}{x} + 3 , the domain excludes x=0. The graph must show an asymptote for the line x=0. As x approaches 0 from the left, f(x) tends to -\infty; as x approaches 0 from the right, f(x) approaches +\infty. Consider carefully what happens to the function as x itself decreases without bound, and what happens as x increases without bound!
 
Or the OP might have meant f(x) = 2/(x + 3), but isn't aware of the need for parentheses to distinguish this function from y = (2/x) + 3.

Both functions are asymptotic to the x-axis, but have different vertical asymptotes.
 
Is it absolutely necessary to find out the behavior of x -> a if you calculate whether the interval increases/decreases and the concavity?
 
And i did mean 2 / (x+3). I was just copying what was down on the page, but I know my original post was wrong. I was looking for the y intercept, which there isn't, correct? I'm just wondering if on top of finding if the interval increase/decrease and concavity I should also find the behavior of the limit. Thanks
 
Boom101 said:
Is it absolutely necessary to find out the behavior of x -> a if you calculate whether the interval increases/decreases and the concavity?
Let's get the terminology right so that people can understand what you're trying to say. The interval doesn't decrease or increase, but there are intervals on which the function increases or decreases. And there are intervals on which the graph of the function is concave up or concave down.

Knowing where the function is increasing or decreasing and where its graph is concave up or concave down will give you an idea of what the limits near the vertical asymptotes, so you could probably get away with not doing that work. OTOH, doing it gives you a check against your other work, so if you get different results, that means you did something wrong.

Boom101 said:
And i did mean 2 / (x+3). I was just copying what was down on the page, but I know my original post was wrong. I was looking for the y intercept, which there isn't, correct? I'm just wondering if on top of finding if the interval increase/decrease and concavity I should also find the behavior of the limit. Thanks
Right, there is no y-intercept. Finding the behavior around the vertical asymptote and as x gets large or very negative can be done quickly. When x is near -3, the denominator is close to 0, but the values will all be positive on one side of -3 and will all be negative for values on the other side of -3.

When x is very large, the expression 2/(x + 3) will be close to 0 (but positive). When x is very negative, this expression will also be close to 0, but will be negative. These say something about how the graph of the function approaches zero for very large or very negative values of x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
929
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K