Solving First-Year Physics Textbook Puzzle: Adding Squared Equations

mohdhm
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
ok this is in an example in a first-year physics textbook, yet some how i spent an hour trying to solve it (identities, tricks, etc) and could not find a solution.

here is what the textbook states:
(1) v2f*cos\phi = 3.5*10^5 - v1f*cos(37)
(2) v2f*cos\phi = v1f*sin(37)

"now we sqaure these two equations and add them"

= 1.23*10^11 - 7*10^5*v1f*cos(37) + v1f^2*cos(37)^2 + v1f^2*sin(37)^2

(then it simplifies further)

I know that 1.23*10^11 is (3.5*10^5)^2 and that 7*10^5 is 2*3.5*10^5any help in explaining how this equation is derived would be a great help (ESPECIALLY how 7*10^5 seems to pop out of no where)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Did you try squaring and adding the terms?
 
mohdhm said:
any help in explaining how this equation is derived would be a great help (ESPECIALLY how 7*10^5 seems to pop out of no where)

More importantly, where did that cos(37) come from?
 
sorry the cos 35 is supposed to be cos 37. my mistake.

Yes i did try adding them and squaring them. your point? why the **** would i take the time to ****ing type it down clearly for your convenience.
 
mohdhm said:
Yes i did try adding them and squaring them. your point?
You obviously missed something doing that. Remeber that -2ab when expanding (a-b)^2?
 
lol, you know what... i didn't forget that i should get -2ab... i made an even dumber mistake... i did (a^2 - b^2)

wow... thanks for pointing it out though, holy crap.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top