Solving for (0.35)(0.025) Difference in 0.18676 and 0.175

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonseh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating shear flow using the Q factor in a structural analysis problem. A participant initially attempts to use a middle section for their calculation, resulting in an incorrect answer due to a misunderstanding of the neutral axis measurement. It is clarified that the correct approach involves using the full area of the connected part and adjusting the calculation by dividing by two, as there are two shear planes involved. The importance of accurately determining the centroid distance from the neutral axis is emphasized for correct results. Ultimately, the correct method allows for the use of the green area, provided the necessary adjustments are made.
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For this question , i am not sure how to get the Q , Can i use the middle part instead of the right part ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


if i use middle part , my ans would be (0.35)(0.025)(0.18676-0.175) = 1.03x10^-4 , which is different from the ans . Is it wrong ? If it's wrong , why can't i take the middle section ( green part) ?
 

Attachments

  • 509.PNG
    509.PNG
    42.7 KB · Views: 409
  • 510.PNG
    510.PNG
    8.9 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
fonseh said:

Homework Statement


For this question , i am not sure how to get the Q , Can i use the middle part instead of the right part ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


if i use middle part , my ans would be (0.35)(0.025)(0.18676-0.175) = 1.03x10^-4 , which is different from the ans . Is it wrong ? If it's wrong , why can't i take the middle section ( green part) ?
That is a good observation, you certainly can take the green part, but your calculation is wrong because the neutral axis dimension of 0.18676 is measured from the top and I think you measured from the bottom. If you adjust your calc accordingly, the shear flow is exactly twice the other method, because there are 2 shear planes in the bolts when you do it this way, so you must divide that value by 2 to determine the bolt shear force.
 
  • Like
Likes fonseh
PhanthomJay said:
If you adjust your calc accordingly, the shear flow is exactly twice the other method,
Whta do you mean ? can you show it ?
 
PhanthomJay said:
That is a good observation, you certainly can take the green part, but your calculation is wrong because the neutral axis dimension of 0.18676 is measured from the top and I think you measured from the bottom. If you adjust your calc accordingly, the shear flow is exactly twice the other method, because there are 2 shear planes in the bolts when you do it this way, so you must divide that value by 2 to determine the bolt shear force.
why the area that we take not this area only ? refer to the attachment i uploaded ( green part) , i said so because when the planes area sheared , the green area is connected to the each other , right ?

Here's the definition of Q to support my answer
 

Attachments

  • 517.PNG
    517.PNG
    17.9 KB · Views: 406
fonseh said:
why the area that we take not this area only ? refer to the attachment i uploaded ( green part) , i said so because when the planes area sheared , the green area is connected to the each other , right ?

Here's the definition of Q to support my answer
No, the book has it right and you would have had it right in your first post if you had not made the calc error for y'_bar and not forgotten to divide by 2. The area you show in your last post is incorrect.
These shear flow problems can be challenging. You are taught that Q is calculated using the atea above or below he section of interest, but that does not apply for connected parts when you are looking for connection bolt stresses and not the wood itself stresses. You must use the full area of the connected part like you did in your original post.
 
  • Like
Likes fonseh
PhanthomJay said:
No, the book has it right and you would have had it right in your first post if you had not made the calc error for y'_bar and not forgotten to divide by 2. The area you show in your last post is incorrect.
These shear flow problems can be challenging. You are taught that Q is calculated using the atea above or below he section of interest, but that does not apply for connected parts when you are looking for connection bolt stresses and not the wood itself stresses. You must use the full area of the connected part like you did in your original post.
do you meanit is correct also to use the green area , if i use the green area in the first post , i must divide it by 2 ?
 
fonseh said:
do you meanit is correct also to use the green area , if i use the green area in the first post , i must divide it by 2 ?
Yes! Redo it using the correct value for the distance from the centroid of your area to the neutral axis.
 
  • Like
Likes fonseh
Back
Top