Solving for a Differential Equation with Inspection.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation through inspection, with the original problem presented in a mathematical format. The user expresses difficulty in manipulating the equation, particularly in simplifying terms involving variables m and n. There is a suggestion to consider the equation's structure, noting that certain terms could be treated as exact differentials. Participants discuss the potential to multiply the equation by a constant to aid in simplification. The conversation highlights the challenges of transforming the equation into a more solvable form while exploring various strategies.
Kiziaru
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm rather bad at solving by inspection, and right now I am stuck on a problem I can't solve.1.http://www.texify.com/img/%5CLARGE%5C%21y%28x%5E2y%5E2-m%29dx%2Bx%28x%5E2y%5E2%2Bn%29dy%3D0.gif
2.The attempt at a solution
http://www.texify.com/img/%5CLARGE%5C%21x%5E2y%5E3dx-mdx%2Bx%5E3y%5E2dy%2Bndy%3D0.gif

Rearrange and divide by x^2 * y^2

http://www.texify.com/img/%5CLARGE%5C%21ydx%2Bxdy%20%3D%20%28mydx-nxdy%29/x%5E2y%5E2.gif

I know that xdy+ydx = d(xy) buy I don't know what to do with the other side. If I try to make the right side into d(mx/ny) I'm left over with an x^2 that I don't know how to get rid of.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Kiziaru! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(I haven't actually tried to solve this :redface:, but …)

my immediate reaction on seeing that m and n was to think "xm and yn"
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Kiziaru! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(I haven't actually tried to solve this :redface:, but …)

my immediate reaction on seeing that m and n was to think "xm and yn"

Thanks! I've always lurked on this site, but I never posted because most of what I needed help with was already answered, until today. :frown:

Also, I hate to sound dumb, but what wizardry is this? How can I make m and n into exponents? And is this part of a plan to get d(arctan(y/x))?
 
Kiziaru said:
How can I make m and n into exponents? And is this part of a plan to get d(arctan(y/x))?

no specific plan … just a vague idea :smile:

remember, you can multiply the whole equation by anything you like :wink:
 
What I see is that if you ignore the terms with m and n, the other part is exact...
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
21K