Solving for equations of motion in a system of three coupled oscillators

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of formulating equations of motion for a system of three coupled oscillators, each mass connected by springs. The user is struggling to reconcile the Lagrangian and Newtonian approaches, particularly regarding the contributions of the springs to the forces acting on each mass. It is clarified that the force on the middle mass depends on the displacements of its neighboring masses, leading to a tri-diagonal matrix representation for acceleration and displacement. The potential energy terms for the springs are debated, with suggestions on how to define them based on the separations between the masses. Ultimately, understanding the coupling between the masses is essential for correctly modeling the system.
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Hello all.

I am having a substantially difficult time with what should be, actually, a very simple problem.

I have three masses, each with a spring on each side (so three masses and four springs total in the system). My problem is writing down the equations of motion. I can do it when there are two masses and three springs, but I'm not sure what's happening with this many. I tried writing down the Lagrangian to compare to my Newtonian equations of motion, but they weren't the same, so somethings definitely wrong with one (or both) of them.

Basically, the problem is - assuming mass one is displaced to the right, we have a term with k2(x2-x1) where k2 is the second spring constant, and x2-x1 is the separation distance between mass 1 and 2. But now we also have another spring on the other side of mass 2, so do I need another term for k3(x3-x2)?

What happens with the middle spring?

Also, I prefer the Lagrangian method.. it just may not be right because of the same problem. Would the potential energy spring extensions be something like x1, x1-x2,x2-x3 and -x3? That's what I used for constructing my potential energies, but not sure these separations are correct...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with the Lagrangian representation, but yes, the force on each mass depends on the displacement of its neighbours. This is the definition of coupling.
Essentially the acceleration and displacement are related by a matrix that is tri?diagonal.

If I remember correctly it is reasonably easy to find some special solutions for an infinite chain, eg harmonic waves. A terminated chain will be slightly more complicated.

Not sure what you mean by middle spring... for a 3mass/4spring system there is a middle mass but not middle spring. The middle mass has force k(x1-2x2+x3).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
131
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top