MHB Solving for $F(v,f)$ in Tensor $F$

  • Thread starter Thread starter smile1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
smile1
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

Here is the problem:

Find the value $F(v,f)$ of the tensor $F=e^1\otimes e_2 +e^2\otimes(e_1+3e_3)\in T^1_1(V)$ where $v=e_1+5e_2+4e_3, f=e^1+e^2+e^3$

Does $e^1\otimes e_2=0$ in this problem?Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't think so, it seems to me that $e^1 \otimes e_2$ corresponds to the matrix:

$E_{12} = \begin{bmatrix}0&1&0\\0&0&0\\0&0&0 \end{bmatrix}$

which is not the 0-matrix.

That is, that:

$e^i \otimes e_j (v,u^{\ast}) = u^TE_{ij}v $, a scalar in the underlying field.
 
Deveno said:
I wouldn't think so, it seems to me that $e^1 \otimes e_2$ corresponds to the matrix:

$E_{12} = \begin{bmatrix}0&1&0\\0&0&0\\0&0&0 \end{bmatrix}$

which is not the 0-matrix.

That is, that:

$e^i \otimes e_j (v,u^{\ast}) = u^TE_{ij}v $, a scalar in the underlying field.

Got it, thanks a lot:)
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top