How to solve for i in compounding interest formula A=P(1+i)^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjp88
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve for i in the compounding interest formula A=P(1+i)^n, the correct approach involves using the formula (A/P)^(1/n) - 1 = i. In the example of doubling money from 1 to 2 over 5 years, substituting the values gives (2/1)^(1/5) - 1 = i. The error arises when not using brackets correctly in the calculator; entering 2^1/5 results in an incorrect calculation. The proper input should be 2^(1/5), which yields approximately 1.14869, leading to the correct interest rate of about 0.149. Proper bracket usage in calculations is essential for accurate results.
cjp88
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble understanding how to solve for i. This is the formula for compounding interest. I'm reading this example which shows how to solve for i if you double your money in 5 years. So it gives this example:

(A/P)^1/n - 1 = i

So it gives A for 2 and P for 1, n would be 5 so the answer should be:

(2/1)^1/n - 1 = i

They shown the answer as 0.149 however I cannot get this same answer for whatever reason.

When I put in 2/1 I get 2, then 2^1/5 would be 0.4, minus 1 would make it -0.6.

If this answer is indeed right, could someone please show me what I'm missing.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2^\frac{1}{5} can't be 0.4, since (0.4)^5 is way smaller than 1 (since 0.4<1).

Since 0.4 = 2/5, you must've raised 2 to the 1th (which is two) and divided that answer by 5.
If you're using a calculator, be sure to put in the brackets correctly: 2^(1/5)-1.
 
I see what the problem was, I wasn't using brackets on my calculator. If I do 2^1/5 I get the wrong answer because it does 2^1 which is 2 then divides by 5 to get 0.4 instead of 2^(1/5) being 1.14869...

Thanks for the help on seeing my error.
 
Yes, if you just put in "2^1/5", your calculator interprets that as (2^1)/5 = 2/5= .4.
Use 2^(1/5) instead.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top