Solving for Levels in a Binary Lattice - Understanding Arithmetic Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwinston
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic Series
rwinston
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am currently working through the following issue: I am trying to read an list of values which contains the data points for a binomial lattice. If I have a list of N values that describes a binary tree, and I want to find out how many levels deep L the tree is, I can easily do it via the following method, since at each level, the number of nodes in the tree is 2^N-1:<br /> N=2^L-1<br />

<br /> N+1=2^L<br />

<br /> log_2{N}=L<br />

So the number of nodes increases like: 1, 3, 7, 15, 31...But a binary lattice is different - the number of nodes increases like 1,3,6,10,15...i.e. it is an arithmetic sum:

<br /> N = \sum_{i=1}^L i<br />

My issue is: given N, how can I solve for L?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Got it, d'oh!

<br /> L = \frac{\sqrt{8N+1}-1}{2}<br />
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top