Solving for ln(-e), (-1)^i, and (2i)^1+i in Rectangular Form

  • Thread starter Thread starter ilikephysics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the rectangular form of ln(-e), (-1)^i, and (2i)^(1+i) using the principal value of the logarithm. For ln(-e), the calculation leads to ln(-e) = 1 + iπ. The expression (-1)^i is simplified to cos(π/ln(e)) + i*sin(π/ln(e)). Lastly, (2i)^(1+i) is expressed as cos(ln(2)*ln(2)/ln(e)) + i*sin(ln(2)*ln(2)/ln(e)). The calculations emphasize the importance of converting to polar form and applying properties of logarithms and Euler's formula.
ilikephysics
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Find the value of ln(-e), (-1)^i, and (2i)^1+i in rectangular x+iy form, using the principal value of the logarithm.

This is what I'm doing for each one:

ln(-e)= e^ln(-e)

(-1)^i= e^(i)(ln(-1))

(2i)^1+i= e^(1+i)ln(2i)

If this is right, where do I go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, each statement is TRUE but do they help at all?

One reason the problem specifically says "in rectangular form" is that you will want to convert to "polar form" to do the calculations- then convert back.

If you write a complex number z= x+iy in "polar form" as
r eiθ, then ln(z)= ln(r)+ iθ Notice that in the first for, r eiθ, adding or subracting π to θ will not change z but will change ln(z). The point of "principal value of the logarithm" is to specify θ: it must be between 0 and 2π.
In particular, -e= e ei(π). That is, r= e and θ= iπ. ln(-e)= ln(e)+iπ= 1+ iπ

For (-1)i, use the fact that (eiθ)i= e(i*i)θ= e-θ. -1= eiπ so -1i= e-π.
 


To solve for ln(-e), we can use the properties of logarithms to rewrite it as ln(e^-1) and then use the fact that ln(e) = 1 to get ln(-e) = -1. This means that the rectangular form of ln(-e) is -1 + 0i.

For (-1)^i, we can use the fact that i is equal to ln(-1)/ln(e) and rewrite it as e^(ln(-1)/ln(e)). Using the properties of logarithms again, we can rewrite this as e^(ln(-1))^(1/ln(e)). Since ln(-1) is equal to i*pi, we have (-1)^i = e^(i*pi)^(1/ln(e)). We can then use Euler's formula, e^(ix) = cos(x) + i*sin(x), to get (-1)^i = cos(pi/ln(e)) + i*sin(pi/ln(e)). Therefore, the rectangular form of (-1)^i is cos(pi/ln(e)) + i*sin(pi/ln(e)).

Finally, for (2i)^1+i, we can use the properties of logarithms once again to rewrite it as (2i)^ln(2i)^(1/ln(e)). Using Euler's formula, we can rewrite this as (2i)^(i*ln(2))^(1/ln(e)). Simplifying, we get (2i)^i^(ln(2)/ln(e)). Again, using Euler's formula, we can rewrite this as (cos(ln(2)) + i*sin(ln(2)))^(ln(2)/ln(e)). Finally, using De Moivre's theorem, we can simplify this to (cos(ln(2)*ln(2)/ln(e)) + i*sin(ln(2)*ln(2)/ln(e))). Therefore, the rectangular form of (2i)^1+i is cos(ln(2)*ln(2)/ln(e)) + i*sin(ln(2)*ln(2)/ln(e)).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top