Solving for n: How Many Grams of Hydrogen in 6.25L @ 1.95ATM & 243K?

  • Thread starter Thread starter n108
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grams Hydrogen
AI Thread Summary
To find the number of grams of hydrogen in 6.25 L at 1.95 ATM and 243 K, use the ideal gas law equation, pV = nRT. Substituting the known values: (1.95 atm) * (6.25 L) = n * (0.0821 L atm mol-1 K-1) * (243 K). Rearranging gives n = (1.95 * 6.25) / (0.0821 * 243), which calculates to approximately 0.61 moles of hydrogen. To convert moles to grams, multiply by the molar mass of hydrogen (2 g/mol), resulting in about 1.22 grams of hydrogen. This calculation provides the required mass of hydrogen gas under the specified conditions.
n108
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
If there are 6.25 L of Hydrogen gas at a pressure of 1.95 ATM and a temperature of 243 K, how many grams of hydrogen are there?

I know that the equation for the ideal gas law is:
pV = nRT
p = pressure
V = volume
n = number of moles
R = the gas constant, 0.0821 L atm mol-1 K-1
T = temperature

but I don't know how to fill in n, the number of moles.
this is my unfinished equation:
(1.95 atm) (6.25 L) = (n) (0.00821 atm mol-1 K-1) (243 K)

help, please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know PV = nRT, and you are given P, V, R, and T. You even have R in the correct units. Just solve it!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top