Solving for Sin with no calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter BeautifulLight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator Sin
BeautifulLight
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Solving for Sin with no calculator + additional questions

Untitled.jpg


Sinθ=opp/hyp

Sinθ=5/3

Sinθ=1.6


I know the answer is 35.87°. I would like to convert 1.6 to 35.87° but am unsure how.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
BeautifulLight said:
View attachment 72721

Sinθ=opp/hyp

Sinθ=5/3

Sinθ=1.6


I know the answer is 35.87°. I would like to convert 1.6 to 35.87° but am unsure how.

Sinθ=3/5=0.6. You need a calculator or sine table.
 
mathman said:
Sinθ=3/5=0.6. You need a calculator or sine table.

Oops!

It's impossible to figure out? I am trying to prepare myself for the Accuplacer exam. Calculators are not allowed.
 
This is not an angle that any reasonable person would expect you to know the sine, cosine, or other trig functions for. So finding that angle means that you'll need to use something to get an approximation; i.e., a calculator or table of trig functions.

A more serious problem is that you misused the formula and calculated hyp/opp, instead of opp/hyp. Also, getting a value larger than 1 for the sine of an angle should have been a red flag. The values of sine and cosine are always between -1 and +1 for real number angles.
 
It's a 3-4-5 triangle. Might someone have suggested memorization of its Pythagorean Triple angles, similar to memorizing the unit circle functions?
 
Doug Huffman said:
It's a 3-4-5 triangle. Might someone have suggested memorization of its Pythagorean Triple angles, similar to memorizing the unit circle functions?
Not that I've seen in numerous precalc/trig textbooks. The usual angles to be memorized are 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°, along with their counterparts in the other three quadrants.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top