Solving for t and h when both are unknown.

  • Thread starter Thread starter BUConsul
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve for the time and height of an object falling from rest, the problem involves using the equations of motion under gravity. The object travels 0.51h in the last second of its fall, prompting the need to divide the total fall time into two segments. By establishing expressions for the initial velocity at the start of the last second and applying the acceleration due to gravity, a formula can be derived for the distance traveled during that last second. This derived formula can then be equated to the known distance of 0.51h to find the relationship between time and height. The discussion emphasizes the importance of setting up the problem correctly to derive the necessary equations.
BUConsul
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Okay, so this question has really gotten under my skin.

"An object falls a distance h from rest. If it travels 0.51h in the last 1.00 s, find (a) the time and (b) the height of its fall."

I have some groundwork laid out: a=-g, h=.5gt^2, and that between two points 1 second apart the average velocity is .51h(m/s). The only problem is I end up with equations that are in terms of unknowns 't' and 'h'. I know I lam probably missing something painfully obvious, and I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if it's not to much trouble, some hints versus the actual solution would be appreciated. (I'd like to do as much as possible, how else can I learn?)
Thanks in Advance - David
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Divide the falling time in two, so that it takes t1 seconds to fall the first part and t2=1sec to fall the last part. Then you can give an expression for the velocity at the start of the last part use this combined with the acceleration to make a formula for the distance traveled during the last part and equate that formula with the known height (0.51h) that is traveled during the last part.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top