Solving for T in an acceleration equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter kencamarador
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
To solve for Δt in an acceleration equation involving Δt², the quadratic formula is applicable. In this context, the equation is rearranged to the standard form ax² + bx + c = 0, where 'a' corresponds to the coefficient of t², 'b' includes the term with t, and 'c' is the constant. The equation is derived from the motion equation d = d∅ + v∅t + 1/2 vt², leading to Δd = v∅t + 1/2 vt². By setting Δd to zero, the values of a, b, and c can be identified, allowing for the calculation of two solutions for Δt, corresponding to the maximum height and the end of the trajectory. This method effectively determines the change in time for the given acceleration scenario.
kencamarador
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
http://imgur.com/HeqIYqR

How do I solve for Δt when there's a Δt^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just use the quadratic formula.
 
lep11 said:
Just use the quadratic formula.


So what would b, a and c be?
 
when you set the equation equal to zero a is the t^2 value, b is value with t variable, and c is just the number without the variable with it.

"ax^2 + bx + c"
 
idllotsaroms said:
when you set the equation equal to zero a is the t^2 value, b is value with t variable, and c is just the number without the variable with it.Ty
 
Last edited:
I thought you were trying to solve for the change in time? So you would set the equation equal to zero d = d∅ + v∅t + 1/2 vt^2
and you just put d - d∅ = Δd
Δd = v∅t + 1/2 vt^2

where v∅=initial velocity

so the v∅t would be the b value
1/2 * v would be the a value
you would subtract Δd from both sides to get the equation equal to 0 and Δd would be your c value

it would look like
0 = 1/2vt^ + v∅t - Δd
0 = at^2 + bt + c

so you'll get two answers one at the max height of trajectory when velocity = 0 and one at the end of the trajectory where velocity = 0 again
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top