Solving for the Length of a Leaning Tower: A Simple Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter martine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angels Confusion
martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
A probably very simple question, but at the moment I cannot find the sollution to it. :confused:

take for example the tower of Pisa or any other tower about to fall over. The tower fell to the left and the platform on top now dips 10degrees. Someone measured the vertical height on the right side of the tower from top to surface. What is the length of the tower on the left side?

Thanks very much
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I guess you just want to know the vertical height of a tower, that had an original vertical height of H meters, after the tower has fallen X degrees with respect to vertical?

This would be H times the cosine of X.
 
Draw a picture of the tilted tower. Drop a vertical line from the top of the tower to the ground so that you have a right triangle. The height, Y, is the length of that vertical, opposite to the complement of angle X (since X is measured from the vertical). The "hypotenuse" of the right triangle is H, the height of the tower when it was vertical: "opposite side divided by "hypotenuse", Y/H is the definition of sine. Of course, since that angle is the complement of X, we have Y/H= cos(x)
Since Y/H= cos(X), Y= H*cos(X) just as gerben said.

That is the right side. The length of the left side will be slightly less since that side sank into the ground, causing the tilt. Exactly how much will depend on the diameter of the tower: information you didn't give.
If you know the diametero of the tower, D, you can calculate the "sink" in exactly the same way: continuing your picture below ground, you see a right triangle with angle X, near side D and U, the desired length, the opposite side. Now we have
tan(X)= U/D (definition of tangent) so U= Dtan(X).

The length of the right side, opposite the tilt, is H cos(X) and the length of the left side, above ground, is H cos(X)- D tan(X).
 
It's always useful to draw out a simple diagrams and write down everything you know on it. Usually you can then fairly simply see how to solve the problem.
 
Zurtex said:
It's always useful to draw out a simple diagrams and write down everything you know on it. Usually you can then fairly simply see how to solve the problem.
Or you can wait for an angel to solve it, so you do not learn.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top