Solving for the Period of a Simple Pendulum with Given Initial Conditions

Caltez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A simple pendulum with l = 9.8m satisfies the equation:
\ddot{\theta} + \sin{\theta} = 0

if \Theta_{0} = A

Show that the period T is given by:
T = \int_0^\frac{\pi}{2}\left(\frac{1}{(1 - \alpha \sin^2{\phi})^\frac{1}{2} }\right)d\phi

where,
\alpha=\sin^2{\frac{1}{2}\Theta_{0}}

2. Relevant equation

It seems that I can use:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}x^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)dx
to find a T expression

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I start with:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta

I find the terms in the rational:
\frac{2E}{m}=\frac{2}{2m}(m\dot{\theta}^2 + \omega_{0}^2 \theta^2)
k=\omega_{0}^2 m
Substitute back into t:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\dot{\theta}^2-\omega_{0}\theta^2 + \omega_{0}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta
which is just \ln{\dot{\theta}}
at this point I am doubting whether I am on the right track, any insight would help tremendously!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Drowning in alphabet soup. Can you define all your variables? A picture might help.
 
Sure thing, here's the actual question.
wkMKWaK.jpg
 
Caltez said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
A simple pendulum with l = 9.8m satisfies the equation:
\ddot{\theta} + \sin{\theta} = 0

if \Theta_{0} = A

Show that the period T is given by:
T = \int_0^\frac{\pi}{2}\left(\frac{1}{(1 - \alpha \sin^2{\phi})^\frac{1}{2} }\right)d\phi

where,
\alpha=\sin^2{\frac{1}{2}\Theta_{0}}

2. Relevant equation

It seems that I can use:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}x^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)dx
to find a T expression

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I start with:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta

I find the terms in the rational:
\frac{2E}{m}=\frac{2}{2m}(m\dot{\theta}^2 + \omega_{0}^2 \theta^2)
k=\omega_{0}^2 m
Substitute back into t:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\dot{\theta}^2-\omega_{0}\theta^2 + \omega_{0}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta
which is just \ln{\dot{\theta}}
at this point I am doubting whether I am on the right track, any insight would help tremendously!

Get rid of the ##\pm## sign in your expression for ##t##, The quantity ##( \cdots )^{1/2}## in the denominator is always ##> 0## (by definition of the 1/2-power function), and ##t > 0## also. Therefore, choose the + square root.
 
Caltez said:
It seems that I can use:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}x^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)dx
to find a T expression.
You might want to rethink this. The denominator comes from solving for the speed in ##\frac 12 mv^2 + \frac 12 kx^2 = E##, and the potential term corresponds to a force ##F = -kx##. That's not the same situation you have for the pendulum. The restoring torque isn't a linear function of ##\theta##.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top