Solving for the Period of a Simple Pendulum with Given Initial Conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the period T of a simple pendulum described by the equation \(\ddot{\theta} + \sin{\theta} = 0\) with initial angle \(\Theta_{0} = A\). The period is expressed as an integral involving the parameter \(\alpha = \sin^2{\frac{1}{2}\Theta_{0}}\). Participants suggest using energy equations to find an expression for T, but there is confusion regarding the application of these equations to the pendulum's non-linear dynamics. A key point raised is the need to use the positive square root in the integral expression for time t, as the denominator must remain positive. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying linear mechanics concepts to a non-linear system like the simple pendulum.
Caltez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A simple pendulum with l = 9.8m satisfies the equation:
\ddot{\theta} + \sin{\theta} = 0

if \Theta_{0} = A

Show that the period T is given by:
T = \int_0^\frac{\pi}{2}\left(\frac{1}{(1 - \alpha \sin^2{\phi})^\frac{1}{2} }\right)d\phi

where,
\alpha=\sin^2{\frac{1}{2}\Theta_{0}}

2. Relevant equation

It seems that I can use:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}x^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)dx
to find a T expression

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I start with:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta

I find the terms in the rational:
\frac{2E}{m}=\frac{2}{2m}(m\dot{\theta}^2 + \omega_{0}^2 \theta^2)
k=\omega_{0}^2 m
Substitute back into t:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\dot{\theta}^2-\omega_{0}\theta^2 + \omega_{0}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta
which is just \ln{\dot{\theta}}
at this point I am doubting whether I am on the right track, any insight would help tremendously!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Drowning in alphabet soup. Can you define all your variables? A picture might help.
 
Sure thing, here's the actual question.
wkMKWaK.jpg
 
Caltez said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
A simple pendulum with l = 9.8m satisfies the equation:
\ddot{\theta} + \sin{\theta} = 0

if \Theta_{0} = A

Show that the period T is given by:
T = \int_0^\frac{\pi}{2}\left(\frac{1}{(1 - \alpha \sin^2{\phi})^\frac{1}{2} }\right)d\phi

where,
\alpha=\sin^2{\frac{1}{2}\Theta_{0}}

2. Relevant equation

It seems that I can use:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}x^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)dx
to find a T expression

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I start with:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta

I find the terms in the rational:
\frac{2E}{m}=\frac{2}{2m}(m\dot{\theta}^2 + \omega_{0}^2 \theta^2)
k=\omega_{0}^2 m
Substitute back into t:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\dot{\theta}^2-\omega_{0}\theta^2 + \omega_{0}\theta^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)d\theta
which is just \ln{\dot{\theta}}
at this point I am doubting whether I am on the right track, any insight would help tremendously!

Get rid of the ##\pm## sign in your expression for ##t##, The quantity ##( \cdots )^{1/2}## in the denominator is always ##> 0## (by definition of the 1/2-power function), and ##t > 0## also. Therefore, choose the + square root.
 
Caltez said:
It seems that I can use:
t=\int\left(\frac{1}{\pm(\frac{2E}{m}-\frac{k}{m}x^2)^\frac{1}{2}}\right)dx
to find a T expression.
You might want to rethink this. The denominator comes from solving for the speed in ##\frac 12 mv^2 + \frac 12 kx^2 = E##, and the potential term corresponds to a force ##F = -kx##. That's not the same situation you have for the pendulum. The restoring torque isn't a linear function of ##\theta##.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top