Solving for the Real and Imaginary Number

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the fourth coefficient in a discrete time Fourier Series for a periodic sequence, given three coefficients: a_0 = 3, a_1 = 1-2j, and a_2 = -1. The user attempts to derive a_3 using exponential and trigonometric forms, but expresses confusion regarding the constraints needed for the resulting function to remain real-valued. They suggest that the problem may lack sufficient information, particularly regarding the relationship between coefficients for ensuring a real signal. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the nature of coefficients in Fourier Series and the implications of using complex versus real basis functions. Overall, the need for clarity in the problem statement is emphasized to facilitate a proper solution.
Tan Thom
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the 4th Coefficient in a sample of 4 discrete time Fourier Series coefficients in a real time valued periodic sequence. k = 0,1,2,3

a_k = {3, 1-2j, -1, ?}

Homework Equations



upload_2019-2-19_13-20-48.png


[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



Step 1: (1-2j)e^(j*.5pi*n) +a_3 e ^ -(j*.5pi*n) + 3 + (-1)^(n+1)

Step 2: [(1-2j)(cos (pi/2)n + j sin (pi/2)n) + a_3 (cos (pi/2)n)-j sin (pi/2)n]

Solving for a_3 in the final step is where I am confused.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-19_13-20-48.png
    upload_2019-2-19_13-20-48.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 747
Physics news on Phys.org
I had a lot of experience with such things and the question doesn't seem to be fully formed to me. Perhaps there is some extra info somewhere? Perhaps the solution revolves around making sure that the resulting function will be real valued as stated in question. That sets constraints between coefficients.
However only summing over positive k values Will make it imposible to get a purely real signal. Normally that would happen when a(-k) is the complex conjugate of a(k). Or should it be using a discrete Fourier sin series, summing over real basis functions rather tan over exp(ikx) complex functions? Though you wouldn't need complex coeffs in that case. Need to see the full question I think.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top