Solving for Time and Height of Sphere Meeting | 1 D Motion Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter medinat16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
A sphere is thrown upwards at 30 m/s, while a second sphere is dropped from 60 m above it after a 0.5-second delay. The discussion revolves around calculating the time and height at which the two spheres meet, with initial calculations yielding different results than the teacher's values of 1.68 seconds and 38 meters. Participants express confusion about the interpretation of the 0.5-second delay and how it affects the initial conditions of the spheres. Various calculations suggest that the meeting point could be at different times and heights, indicating a need for clarity in the problem setup. The discrepancies in results highlight the complexities involved in solving motion problems with multiple objects.
medinat16
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sphere is thrown upwards with an initial velocity of 30m/s. A second sphere is dropped from directly above, a height of 60m from from the first sphere, 0.5 seconds later.When do the spheres meet and how high is the point where they meet?Please explain how you got your answer. My teacher got an answer of 1.68sec as the time and 38m as where they meet.

Homework Equations


xf=xi+vit+1/2at^2
vf^2-vi^2=2Δx(a)

The Attempt at a Solution


vi=30m/s
Δx=60m
t=0.5 sec
a=-9.8m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you interpret the "0.5 seconds later". So is the second sphere 60 m from the first sphere, when it is dropped, or is it 60 m from the sphere after the 0.5 seconds?Nonetheless, I do not get the same result as your teacher. I put

xf=xi+vit+1/2at^2

For sphere 1 equal to that of sphere 2, since we want to know the time, where xf_1 = xf_2

I calculated a new initial velocity and a new position for sphere 1 after 0.5 sec with:

vf=vi+a*t = 25.1 m/s

Then the position xf = (vi+vf)*t/2 = 13.775 m

xf_1 = xf_2

xi+vit+1/2at^2 = xi+vit+1/2at^2

13.775m+25.1m/s t+1/2(-9.8m/s^2)t^2 = 60m+0t+1/2(-9.8m/s^2)t^2

solving for t gives 1.84s

I don't see, how this is wrong, perhaps someone else gets the same?
 
I agree with your calculations and I obtain 43.37m as the point of contact using that assumption.
If we calculate assuming the second sphere is 60m away at 0.5 seconds, then:

0m+25.1m/s t+1/2(-9.8m/s2)t2 = 60m+0m/s t+1/2(-9.8m/s2)t2

t = 2.39 s
and xf = 32.01m

Still not your teacher's value.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top