Solving for Translational Speed of a Bowling Ball on a Vertical Rise

  • Thread starter Thread starter kpangrace
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the translational speed of a bowling ball at the top of a 0.76 m vertical rise, apply conservation of energy principles. The kinetic energy at the bottom equals the sum of kinetic and potential energy at the top. The mass of the ball cancels out in the equations, simplifying calculations. The correct approach involves solving for the final velocity after accounting for potential energy gained. Ensure to multiply by 2 and take the square root to find the accurate speed at the top.
kpangrace
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Help! Only Have Until 11:30

A bowling ball encounters a 0.76 m vertical rise on the way back to the ball rack, as the drawing illustrates. Ignore frictional losses and assume that the mass of the ball is distributed uniformly. If the translational speed of the ball is 4.10 m/s at the bottom of the rise, find the translational speed at the top



aahh! finals are next week and i don't know what I'm doing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a certain amount of kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp and no potential energy (using the bottom of the ramp as your base).

At the top of the ramp, you have both kinetic and potential energy, since you gained some height. Your total energy (kinetic plus potential) has to stay constant.

In other words, the kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp is equal to the sum of the kinetic energy and potential energy at the top of the ramp.

And no, the mass won't matter. If you take your equation for kinetic energy and potential energy, you'll notice you can pull the mass outside your parenthesis via the distributive property. The mass will cancel out since it's outside the parenthesis on both sides of the equation.
 
ok i put (1/2)v^2= 1/2 v^2 + gh now is that right? i plug everything in and get .957... which doesn't show up right... you know what I'm doing wrong? thanks in advance
 
Yeah, you stopped too soon.

You solved 1/2 v_i^2-gh
The other side of your equation still has 1/2 v_f^2

You need to multiply your answer by 2 to get rid of the 1/2.
Then you need to take the square root to get rid of power of 2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top